Wind power is growing in Sweden, but the high-level of opposition to turbine proposals has meant that many proposals are never realised. This opposition in a country that has a measured 74% support for wind power leads to questions being raised as to what is causing this opposition. Many have suggested that it is due to prevalent NIMBY attitudes; this, however, is only one factor affecting the public acceptance of turbines. The over-riding factor is the spatial distance between the costs incurred and the benefits derived from wind power. Perceived need for wind power, level of participation, individual considerations of visual impact and the amount to which the local community benefits determine the realisation of turbine proposals.
GrubbM.VigottiR., Renewable energy strategies for Europe – volume 2; Earthscan Publications Ltd.: London, 1997.
6.
European Wind Energy Association.Windforce 12: A blueprint to achieve 12% of the world's electricity from windpower by 2010; EWEA: Brussels, 2001: 1–52.
7.
SOU 199975: Rätt plats för vindkraften. (Summary in English: The right place for windpower)Swedish government: Stockholm, 1999; 1–262.
8.
WolsinkM., Dutch wind power policy: Stagnating implementation of renewables. Energy Policy1996; 24: 1079–1088.
9.
KrohnS.DamborgS., On public attitudes towards wind power. Renewable Energy1999; 16: 954–960.
10.
SimonA.M., A summary of research conducted into attitudes to wind power from 1990–19961996: www.bwea.com/ref/survsum.html Accessed 12th September 2002.
11.
CarlmanI., Wind energy potential in Sweden: The importance of non-technical factors. Fourth International Symposium on Wind Energy Systems, 21st–24th September 1982: 335–342.
12.
HammarlundK., Telephone Interview, 23rd August 2002: Consultant researching public acceptance of wind power in Sweden.
13.
Sifo.Telephone Interviews 29th January – 4th February; Project 3825150(SoCe). Sifo: Stockholm, 2002: 1–8.
14.
GipeP., Wind energy comes of age; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1995.
15.
Vander Loo F.A., Mediating windpower in the Netherlands: The Task Force windpower implementation; Novem: Utrecht, 2001; 1–4.
16.
Skurup's website: www.skurup.se Accessed 18th September 2002.
17.
WebbJ., Can we learn to love the wind? New Scientist1994; 16th July: 12–14.
18.
SOU 2001/02143: Summary of Swedish government's energy bill. Cooperation for a secure, efficient and environmentally-friendly energy supply. Swedish government: Stockholm, 2002; 1–28.
19.
WolsinkM.SprengersM.KeuperA.PedersenT.H.WestraC.A., Annoyance from wind turbine noise on sixteen sites in three countries. European Community Wind Energy Conference, 8th–12th March, Germany1993: 273–276.
20.
MunksgaardJ.LarsenA., Socio-economic assessment of wind power – lessons from Denmark. Energy Policy1998; 26: 85–93.
21.
EricksonW.P.JohnsonG.D.StricklandM.D.YoungD.P.Jr.SemkaK.J.GoodR.E., Avian collision with wind turbines: A summary of exiting studies and comparisons to other sources of avian collision mortality in the US; National Wind Co-ordinating Committee: Washington DC, 2001: 1–67.
22.
DannemandAnderson P., Review of historical and modern utilization of Wind Power1999 on: www. risoe.dk/rispubl/vea/dannemand.htm Accessed 12th August 2002.
23.
NilssonL., Interview, 13th September 2002: Sveriges Ornitologiska Förening spokesperson and lecturer at zoo-ecology, Lund University.
24.
PerssonV., Remissyttrande over vindkraftutredningens slutbetänkande (SOU 1999:75) Rätt plats för vindkraften. Teracom IL15/99: Stockholm, 1999: 1–5.
25.
Boverket, Handbok för lokalisering av vindkraftverk; Boverket: Eskistuna, 2001: 1–121.
26.
Boverket, Planering och prövning av vindkraftsanläggningar; Boverket: Eskistuna, 2002: 1–115.
27.
FyhrP., Personal correspondence, 9th October 2002: Local resident of proposed turbines siting and representative of Foreningen Svenskt Landskapsskydd (local opposition group).
28.
Stadsarkitektkontoret i Lund.Vindkraft i Lunds kommun: Aktualisering av översiktplan för LundPM 19; Stadsarkitektkontoret i Lund: Lund, 1998: 1–110.
29.
WiklundA., Vindkraftpark Lillgrund: Miljökonsekevensbeskrivning tillhörande ansökan om tillstånd enligt miljöbalken. SWECO VIAK: Jönköping, 2001; 1–190.
30.
LänsstyrelsenVindkraft i Skåne. Analysis och konsekvenser av olika scenarier. Länsstyrelsen: Kristianstad, 2002; 1–94.
31.
HomseyG., Power to the people. Planning2001; 6: 24–28.
32.
BagerP., Telephone Interview, 4th September 2002: Local farmer and regional authority employee.
33.
WolsinkM., Entanglement of interests and motives: Assumptions behind the NIMBY theory of facility siting. Urban Studies1994; June: 1–9.
34.
SpowersR., Going with the wind. Geographical Magazine2000, 12: 58–62.
35.
ColmoB., Personal correspondence, 20th October 2002: Local authority employee.
36.
WolsinkM., Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: Institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renewable Energy2000; 21: 49–64.
37.
HammarlundK., Improving acceptance in wind power planning. European Union Wind Energy Conference, 20th–24th May, Göteborg1996: 152–155.
38.
WalkerG., Renewable energy in the UK: The Cinderella sector transformed?Geography1997; 82: 59–74.
39.
BruntA.SpoonerD., The development of wind power in Denmark and the UK. Energy & Environment, 1998; 9: 279–296.
40.
CarlmanI., Wind power in Denmark! Wind power in Sweden?Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics1988; 27: 337–345.
41.
MorthorstP.E., Capacity development and profitability of wind turbines. Energy Policy1999; 27: 779–787.
42.
MorthorstP.E., The development of a green certificate market. Energy Policy1999; 28: 1085–1094.
43.
Elforsk. Driftuppföljning av vindkraftverk. Årsrapport2000. Energimyndigheten, Stockholm. 2001: 1–41.
44.
European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) (2005), Support Schemes for Renewable Energy, report to the European Commission, ALTENER contract no. 4-1030/Z/02-054/2002.
45.
Vander Loo F.A., Interview, 25th September2002: Director of Task Force Wind power Implementation; Novem, Dutch Wind Energy Agency.
46.
HammarlundK., Planning for acceptance. European Wind Energy Conference, 1st–5th March, Nice1999: 582–585.
47.
LeeT.R.WrenB.A.HickmanM.E., Public responses to the siting and operation of wind turbines. Wind Engineering1989; 13:188–196.
48.
Mori.Tourist attitudes towards wind farms. Mori, Scotland, 2002: 1–7.
