This paper investigates the impact of deploying control surfaces on a model 5 MW offshore wind turbine blade. The wind turbine blade is modeled in 3D based on NREL's 5 MW wind turbine and incorporates varying airfoil shapes and structural twist along the blade length. Lift and aero-dynamic moment at various angle of attack settings are simulated and analyzed. Partial span-wise trailing-edge 3D control surfaces are modeled, simulated and analyzed at various control angles. Results depict the onset of stall around 22 degrees and a larger lift gain versus 10–15 degrees for standard 2D airfoils. Mid-flap controller enhances lift by a factor 2 and mitigates moment a factor of around 7 while end-flap controller enhances lift by a factor of around 1.024 and mitigates moment by a factor of around 2. The results and comparisons obtained serve as one of many instruments for gauging, designing, analyzing, and optimizing wind turbine systems.
DaynesS.WeaverP.M., Design and Testing of a Deformable Wind Turbine Blade Control Surface, Smart Materials and Structures, 2012, 21, 1–10.
2.
DaynesS.WeaverP.M., A Morphing Trailing Edge Device for a Wind Turbine, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 2012, 23(6), 691–701.
3.
LachenalX.DaynesS.WeaverP.M., Review of Morphing Concepts and Materials for Wind Turbine Blade Applications, Wind Energy, 2012, 10, 1–25.
4.
HoutzagerI.WingerdenJ.W.V.VerhaegenM., Rejection of Periodic Wind Disturbances on a Smart Rotor Test Section Using Lifted Repetitive Control, IEEETransactions on Control Systems Technology, 2012.
5.
VersaillesP.GhoshS.DucH.MassonC., Preliminary Assessment of Wind Turbine Blade Lift Control via Plasma Actuation, Wind Engineering, 2011, 35(3) 339–356.
6.
BarlasT. K.VanderVeenG.J.VanKuikA. M., Model Predictive Control for Wind Turbines with Distributed Active Flaps: Incorporating Inflow Signals and Actuator Constraints, 2011, Wind Energy, 15, 757–771.
7.
BarlasT.K.VanKuikA.M., Review of State of the Art in Smart Rotor Control Research for Wind Turbines, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 2010, 46, 1–27.
8.
BaiY.L.MaX.Y.MingX., Lift Enhancement of Airfoil and Tip Flow Control for Wind Turbine, Applied Mathematics, 2011, 32(7), 825–836.
9.
LeeT.SuY.Y., Lift Enhancement and Flow Structure of Airfoil with Joint Trailing-edge flap and Gurney Flap, Exp. Fluids, 50, 2011, 1671–1684.
10.
BottalaR.J.BraggM.B., Performance of an Airfoil with a Power-Saving Tab-Assisted Flap System, 29th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, 2011.
11.
ShojaeefardAskariS.A., S., Experimental and Numerical Investigation of the Flap Application in an Airfoil in Combination with a Cross-Flow Fan, International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat and Fluid Flow, 2012, 22(6), 742–763.
12.
HeinzJ.SorensonN.N.ZahleF., Investigation of the Load Reduction Potential of Two Trailing Edge Flap Controls using CFD, Wind Energy, 2011, 14, 449–462.
13.
MarkouH.AndersenP.B.LarsenG.C., Potential Load Reductions on Megawatt Turbines Exposed to Wakes using Individual-Pitch Wake Compensator and Trailing-edge Flaps, Wind Energy, 2010, 14, 841–857.
14.
AndersenB.P.HenriksenL.GaunaaM.BakC.BuhlT., Deformable Trailing Edge Flaps for Modern Megawatt Wind Turbine Controllers Using Strain Gauge Sensors, Wind Energy, 2010, 13, 193–206.
15.
HoogedoornE.JacobsG.B.BeyeneA., Aero-Elastic Behavior of a Flexible Blade for Wind Turbine Application: 2D Computational Study, Energy, 2010, 35, 778–785.
16.
JohnsonS.J.BakerJ.P.VanDamC.P.BergD., An Overview of Active Load Control Techniques for Wind Turbines with an Emphasis on Microtabs, Wind Energy, 2010, 13, 239–253.
17.
WilsonD.G.BergD.E.BaroneM.F.BergJ.C.ResorB.R.LobitzD.W., Active Aerodynamic Blade Control Design for Load Reduction on Large Wind Turbines, European Wind Energy Conference & Exhibition, 2009, Marseille, France.
18.
VanDamC.P.ChowR.ZayasJ.R.BergD.E., Computational Investigations of Small Deploying Tabs and Flaps for Aerodynamic Load Control, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2007, 75, 1–10.
19.
JonkmanJ.ButterfieldS.MusialW.ScottG., Definition of a 5-MW Reference Wind Turbine for Offshore System Development, Technical Report- NREL/TP-500-38060, 2009, Task No. WER5.3301.
20.
ZhangF.Z.SöffkerD., Active Flutter Suppression of a Nonlinear Aero elastic System Using PI-Observer, Motion and Vibration Control, 2009, 367–376.
21.
GeorggescuA.M.GeorggescuS.C.BernardS.CosoiuC.L., Comsol Multiphysics Versus Fluent: 2d Numerical Simulation of the Stationary Flow Around a Blade of the Achard Turbine, Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Vortex Dominated Flows, 2007, 52(66), 13–21.
22.
WrightJ.R.CooperE.C.; Introduction to Aircraft Aero elasticity and Loads, Wiley, 2007, ISBN 978-0470-85840-0.
23.
O'NeilT.StrganacT. W.; Aeroelastic Response of a Rigid Wing Supported by Nonlinear Springs, Journal of Aircraft, 1998, 35(4), 1–7.
24.
DowellE. H.CurtissH. C.ScanlanR. H.Jr.SistoF., A Modern Course in Aeroelasticity, 2nd ed., Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA, 1989.
25.
TheodorsenT., General Theory of Aerodynamic Instability and the Mechanism of Flutter, NACA Report 496, 1935.
26.
FungY. C., An Introduction to the Theory of Aeroelasticity, Wiley, New York, 1955.
