In the context of transmission tower optimization, the energy method and the force method are combined in order to form a holistic design and optimization approach, eliminating the need for time-intensive matrix inversion. A migration genetic algorithm is employed in the optimization process. Although this algorithm is suitable for towers with a limited number of elements, it is inefficient in the case of many towers encountered in practice. The addition of a neural network as an analysis tool reduces the overall computational load. Four examples are presented to demonstrate the important role of neural networks in reducing the computational overhead.
Guide Lines for Electrical Transmission Line Structural Loading, ASCE, Task Committee on Structures ASCE, Manuals and Report on Engineering Practice, No.74, 1991.
2.
National Electrical Safety Code, ANSI C2–1993, IEEE, New York, 1993.
3.
IEC-826 Standard, Loading and Strength of Overhead Transmission Lines, International Electro-technical Commission, 1998.
4.
Swedish State Power board, National Electrical Safety Code, NESC1977.
5.
Task Committee on Tower Design of the Committee on Analysis and Design of Structures, Guide for Design of Steel Transmission Towers.Journal of Structural Division ASCE, 1971.
6.
ASCE STANDARD, American Society of Civil Engineering, Design of Latticed Steel Transmission Structures, pp. 10–97.
7.
TIA/EIA STANDARD, Structural Standard for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Supporting Structures, TIA/EIA-222-F.
8.
KavehA.RahamiH., Non-linear Analysis and Optimal Design of Structures Via Force Method and Genetic Algorithm, Computers and Structures, 2006, 84, 770–778.
9.
MühlenbeinH.SchomischM.BornJ., The Parallel Genetic Algorithm as a Function Optimizer, Parallel Computing, 1991, 17, 619–632.
10.
StarkweatherT.WhitleyD.MathiasK., Optimization Using Distributed Genetic Algorithms, Proc. Parallel Problem Solving From Nature 1, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer Verlag, 1990, No. 496, 176–185.
11.
WuS.-J.ChowP.-T., Integrated Discrete and Configuration Optimization of Trusses Using Genetic Algorithms, Computers and Structures, 1995, 55(4), 695–702.
12.
TangW.TongL.GuY., Improved Genetic Algorithm for Design Optimization of Truss Structures With Sizing, Shape and Topology Variables, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2005, 62, 1737–1762.
13.
KavehA.KalatjariV., Size/geometry Optimization of Trusses by the Force Method and Genetic Algorithm, Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 2004, 84(5), 347–357.
14.
VanderplaatsG.N.MosesF., Automated Design of Trusses for Optimum Geometry. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 1972, ST3, 671–690.
15.
FelixJ.E., Shape optimization of trusses subject to strength displacement and frequency constraints, Master Thesis, Naval Postgraduate School, 1981.
16.
PerezR.E.BehdinanK., Particle Swarm Approach for Structural Design Optimization. Computers and Structures, in press, 2007.
17.
XichengW.GuixuM., A Parallel Iterative Algorithm for Structural Optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 1992, 96, 25–32.
18.
VenkayyaV., Design of Optimum Structures. Computers and Structures, 1971, 12(1), 265–309.
19.
ErbaturFHasancebiO.TutuncuI.KilicH., Optimal Design of Planar and Space Structures With Genetic Algorithms. Computers and Structures, 2000, 75, 209–224.
20.
GellatlyR.BerkeL., Optimal Structural Design. Technical Report AFFDL-TR-70-165. Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory (AFFDL), 1971.
21.
SchimitL.FarshiB., Some approximation concepts in structural synthesis. Journal of American Institute of Aeronautic and Astronautic, 1974, 12, 692–699.
22.
ZhouM.RozvanyG., An optimality criteria method for large systems. Part II: Algorithm. Structural Multi-disciplinary Optimization, 1993, 6, 250–262.
23.
SakaM.P., Optimum design of pin-jointed steel structures with practical applications, Journal of Structural Engineering, 1990, 116(10), 2599–2620.
24.
ToganVDalogluA., Optimization of 3D trusses with adaptive approach in genetic algorithms, Engineering Structures, 2006, 28, 1019–1027.
25.
HansenS.R.VanderplaatsG.N., Approximation method for configuration optimization of trusses. AIAA Journal, 1990, 25(1), 161–168.
26.
HasancebiO.UlusoyA.F., Discrete and continuous structural optimization using evolution strategies. In: ToppingBHV, editor. Proceedings of the Eight International Conference on the Application of Artificial Intelligence to Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering. Stirling: Civil-Comp Press, paper 23, 2005.
