Tensegrity structures are attractive as deployable space structures since they are composed mainly of flexible tension members and can thus easily be folded. To automatically deploy such structures it is proposed that the tension members are replaced or enclosed by thin-film tubes, which form a continuous volume. The structure deploys when this volume is pressurised. This concept was studied by numerical simulations of the deployment process in a zero-gravity environment using the control volume method for the fluid-structure interaction. First, single z-folded and coiled tubes were analysed to determine suitable element size, number of control volumes and gas flow rate. Then one- and three-stage tensegrity masts were modelled, folded and finally deployed. The study showed that the deployment concept is feasible.
JenkinsC. H. M. (ed.), Gossamer spacecraft: Membrane and inflatable structures technology for space applications, Vol. 191 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, Reston, VA, USA, 2001.
2.
MotroR., Tensegrity: Structural systems for the future, Kogan Science, 2003.
3.
TibertA. G., Deployable tensegrity structures for space applications, Ph.D. thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden (2002).
4.
SchlaichM., The Messeturm in Rostock — a tensegrity tower, Journal of the IASS45 (145) (2004) 93–98.
5.
FuruyaH., Concept of deployable tensegrity structures in space application, International Journal of Space Structures7 (2) (1992) 143–151.
6.
MikulasM. M.ThomsonM., State of the art and technology needs for large space structures, Vol. 1: New and Projected Aeronautical and Space Systems, Design Concepts, and Loads of Flight-Vehicle Materials, Structures, and Dynamics—Assessment and Future Directions, ASME, New York, 1994, Ch. 3, pp. 173–238.
7.
BouderbalaM.MotroR., Folding tensegrity systems, In: PellegrinoS.GuestS. D. (Eds.), IUTAM-IASS Symposium on Deployable Structures: Theory and Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2000, Cambridge, UK, 1998, pp. 27–36.
8.
SultanC.SkeltonR., Deployment of tensegrity structures, International Journal of Solids and Structures40 (2003) 4637–4657.
9.
TibertA. G.PellegrinoS., Deployable tensegrity masts, In: Proc. 44th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf., Norfolk, VA, USA, 2003, AIAA-2003-1678.
10.
SkeltonR. E.HeM., Smart tensegrity structure for NESTOR, In: RegelbruggeM. E. (Ed.), Smart Structures and Materials 1997—Smart Structures and Integrated Systems, vol. 3041, SPIE, San Diego, 1997, pp. 780–787.
11.
MurataS.JodoiD.FuruyaH.TeradaY.TakadamaK., Inflatable tensegrity module for a large-scale space structure, In: Proc. 56th International Astronautical Congress, Fukuoka, Japan, 2005, IAC-05–D1.1.01.
12.
FuruyaH.MurataS.JodoiD.TeradaY.TakadamaK.NakaharaM., Concept of inflatable tensegrity for large space structures, In: Proc. 47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf., Newport, RI, USA, 2006, AIAA-2006-1700.
13.
GreschikG.BelvinW. K., High-fidelity gravity offloading system for free-free vibration testing, Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets44 (1) (2007) 132–142.
14.
Weaver SmithS.MainJ. A., Modeling the deployment of inflatable space structures, In: JenkinsC. H. M. (Ed.), Gossamer spacecraft: Membrane and inflatable structures technology for space applications, Vol. 191 of Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, AIAA, Reston, VA, USA, 2001, Ch. 5, pp. 203–241.
15.
HirthA.HaufeA.OlovssonL., Airbag simulation with LS-DYNA: Past-present-future, In: Proc. 6th European LS-DYNA Users' Conference, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2007, pp. 23–46.
16.
WangJ. T.NefskeD. J., A new CAL3D airbag inflation model, SAE Transactions, SAE Paper No. 880654 (1988).
SalamaM.KuoC. P.LouM., Simulation of deployment dynamics of inflatable structures, AIAA Journal38 (12) (2000) 2277–2283.
19.
WangJ. T.JohnsonA. R., Deployment simulation methods for ultra-lightweight inflatable structures, NASA Technical Memorandum, NASA/TM-2003-212410, ARL-TR-2973 (June 2003).
20.
BelytschkoT.LiuW. K.MoranB., Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 2000.
21.
BeestenB.HirthA.ReilinkR.RemenspergerR.RiegerD.SeerG., OOP-simulation—a tool to design airbags, In: Proc. 7th Int. Symposium and Exhibition on Sophisticated Car Occupant Safety Systems (Airbag 2004), Karlsruhe, Germany, 2004.
22.
HaugE.ProtardJ. B.MilcentG.HerrenA.BrunnerO., The numerical simulation of the inflation process of space rigidized antenna structures, In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Spacecraft Structures and Mechanical Testing, Noordwijk, The Netherlands, 1991, pp. 861–869, ESA SP-321.
23.
MiyasakiY.UchikiM., Deployment dynamics of inflatable tube, In: Proceedings of the 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit, Denver, CO, USA, 2002, AIAA-2002-1254.
24.
HamamotoY.MiyazakiY., Stable deployment of rolled-up inflatable tube by control of gas flow, In: Proceedings of the 54th International Astronautical Congress, Bremen, Germany, 2003, IAC-03–I.2.07.
25.
CookR. D.MalkusD. S.PleshaM. E.WittR. J., Concepts and applications of finite element analysis, 4th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2002.
26.
ESA/ESTEC, Catalogue of benchmark cases for the analysis inflatable structures, ESA/ESTEC Technical note TOS-MCS/2003/780/In/SL.
27.
NefskeD. J., A basic airbag model, In: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. on Passive Restraints, Detroit, MI, USA, 1972.
28.
WongY. W., Wrinkling of thin membrane structures, Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (2003).
29.
LampaniL.LangloisS.TuminoG.GaudenziP., Numerical simulation of the behavior of inflatable structures, In: Proc. 2nd European Workshop on Inflatable Space Structures, Tivoli, Italy, 2004.
30.
YeeJ. C. H.PellegrinoS., Foldable composite structures, In: ChenC. S. (Ed.), Proceedings of IASS-APCS 2003, Taipei, Taiwan, 2003.
31.
FreelandR. E.VealG. R., Significance of the inflatable antenna experiment technology, In: Proc. 39th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conf., Long Beach, CA, USA, 1998, aIAA-98-2104.
32.
JenkinsC. H. M.MarkerD. K.McElroyP. M., Lectures notes for short course: Gossamer spacecraft—analysis and design, AIAA Professional Development (5–6 April 2003).
33.
PalisocA.VealG.CassapakisC.GreschikG.MikulasM., Geometry attained by pressurized membranes, In: Proc. Conf. of Space Telescopes and Instruments, Vol. 3356 of SPIE, Kona, HI, USA, 1998, pp. 747–757.
34.
FreelandR. E.BilyeuG. D., IN-STEP inflatable antenna experiment, In: Proc. 43rd Int. Astronautical Federation Congress, Washington, USA, 1992, IAF-92-0301.
35.
RussellC., Deployment simulation of inflatable tensegrity frameworks, Master of Science Thesis, KTH Engineering Sciences, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden (2005).
36.
UnderwoodP., Dynamic relaxation, In: BelytschkoT.HughesT. J. R. (Eds.), Computational Methods for Transient Analysis, vol. 1, North-Holland, 1983, pp. 245–265.
37.
SultanC., Modeling, design, and control of tensegrity structures with applications., Ph.D. thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA (1999).
38.
DerbesB., Case studies in inflatable rigidizable structural concepts for space power, 'in: Proc. 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, USA, 1999, AIAA-1999-1089.
