This paper examines the criteria for the architectural design of space structures in low-stress environments, where stress-carrying ability is no longer a relevant consideration in the design of the space structure. In such environments, ergonomics and minimum surface criteria can lead to the most efficient design of the space structure. Based on these two criteria, the paper then considers the architectural design of a space tunnel and an interchange station. In direction-controlled artificial gravity environments, the nesting of ergonomic shapes, for minimum surface area, can lead to even more cost-effective design. 3–D computer graphics are used to display the results of this research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MorganMorris Hickey, “Vitruvius: The Ten Books on Architecture”, p 13–16, Dover Publications Inc., New York, N.Y., 1960.
2.
PaneroJulius, “Human Dimension and Interior Space”, Watson-Guptill Publications, New York, N.Y., 1979.
3.
LacknerJames R.DiZioPaul, “Human orientation and movement control in weightless and artificial gravity environments”, Review Article, Exp Brain Res (2000) 130:2–26Springer-Verlag, Germany, 2000.
4.
HallT, “Inhabiting Artificial Gravity”, AIAA Space Technology Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico, September 1999.
5.
AlequinW., “HABITABILITY CAMELOT IV, Proc. of the 6th Annual Summer Conference, NASA/USRA, NASA Lewis Research Center, June 1990, pp 187–193.
