Effect of Back Support Condition on Seat to Head Transmissibilities of Seated Occupants under Vertical Vibration

Abstract

The seat-to-head transmissibility (STHT) of seated human subjects has been investigated through measurements of vertical seat vibration transmitted to the head in both vertical and fore-and-aft directions. The experiment was performed using 12 adult male subjects exposed to whole-body vertical random vibration in the 0.5–15 Hz frequency range. The effects of back support conditions on the transmitted vibration were investigated by considering three back support conditions (No back support, vertical back support, and inclined back support), and two different hands positions (hands in lap and hands on the steering wheel) while exposed to three magnitudes of excitation (0.25, 0.5 and 1.0 m/s² rms acceleration). A helmet-strap-mounted accelerometer mounting system was designed to measure the head acceleration motions along the three translational axes. The results attained from ANOVA suggested a strong influence of the back support condition on the magnitude of both the vertical and fore-and-aft STHT. The results also revealed the nonlinear response of the seated body with respect to the excitation magnitude, while the effect of hands position was judged to be insignificant.

References

Bovenzi

Hulshof

C. T. J.

An updated review of epidemiologic studies on the relationship between exposure to whole-body vibration and low back pain. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998, Vol. 215, No. 4, pp. 595–612.

Seidel

Bluthner

Hinz

Schust

On the health risk of the lumbar spine due to whole-body vibration—theoretical approach, experimental data and evaluation of whole-body vibration, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998, Vol. 215, No. 4, pp. 723–741.

Boileau

P.-E.

and Rakheja

Definition of a range of idealized values to characterize seated body biodynamic response under vertical vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998, Vol. 215, No. 4, pp. 841–862.

International Standard for Standardization. Mechanical vibration and shock range of idealized values to characterize seated-body biodynamic response under vertical vibration. ISO-5982, 2001.

Fairley

T. E.

and Griffin

M.J.

The apparent mass of the seated human body: Vertical vibration. Journal of Biomechanics, 1989, 22, pp. 81–94.

Holmlund

Lundstrom

and Lindberg

Mechanical impedance of the human body in vertical direction. Applied Economics, 2000, 31, pp. 415–422.

Lundstrom

and Holmlund

(1998). Absorption of energy during whole-body vibration exposure. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998, Vol. 215, No. 4, pp. 789–799.

Mansfield

N. J.

Holmlund

Lundstram

Apparent mass and absorbed power during exposure to whole-body vibration and repeated shocks. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2001, Vol. 248, No. 3, pp. 427–440.

Rakheja

Boileau

P.-E.

and Stiharu

Seated occupant apparent mass characteristics under automotive postures and vertical vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2002, Vol. 253, No. 1, pp. 57–75.

10.

Wang

Rakheja

, and Boileau

P.-É.

Effects of sitting posture on biodynamic response of seated occupants under vertical vibration. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2004, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 289–306.

11.

Hulshof

Van Zanten

B.V.

Whole-body vibration and low back pain. A review of epidemiologic studies. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 1987, 59, pp. 205–220.

12.

Magnusson

Pope

M.H.

Hulshof

, and Bovenzi

Development of a protocol for epidemiological studies of whole-body vibration and musculoskeletal disorders of the low back. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998, Vol. 215, No. 4, pp. 643–651.

13.

Matsumoto

and Griffin

M.J.

Movement of the upper-body of seated subjects exposed to vertical whole-body vibration at the principal resonance frequency. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998, Vol. 215, No. 4, pp. 743–762.

14.

Pope

M.H.

Broman

Svensson M.H.

and Anderson

G.B.J.

Mounting of the transducers in measurement of segmental motion of the spine. Journal of Biomechanics, 1986, 19, pp. 675–677.

15.

Panjabi

M.M.

Anderson

G.B.J.

Jorneus

Hult

and Mattsson

In vivo measurements of spinal column vibrations. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated 1986, 68A, pp. 695–702.

16.

Sandover

and Dupuis

A reanalysis of spinal motion during vibration, Ergonomics, 1987, 30, pp. 975–985.

17.

Magnusson

Pope

Rostedt

, and Hansson

Effect of backrest inclination on the transmission of vertical vibrations through the lumbar spine. Clinical Biomechanics, 1993, 8, pp. 5–12.

18.

Paddan

G.S.

and Griffin

M.J.

A review of the transmission of translational seat vibration to the head. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1998, Vol. 215, No. 4, pp. 863–882.

19.

Rakheja

and Boileau

P.-E.

Analyses of the relationships between biodynamic response function. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1999, Vol. 226, No. 3, pp. 595–606.

20.

Paddan

G.S.

and Griffin

M.J.

The transmission of translational seat vibration to the head -I. Vertical seat vibration. Journal of Biomechanics, 1988, 21, pp. 191–197.

21.

Paddan

G.S.

and Griffin

M.J.

The transmission of translational seat vibration to the head II. Horizontal seat vibration. Journal of Biomechanics, 1988. 21, pp. 199–206.

22.

Paddan

G.S.

and Griffin

M.J.

Transmission of roll and pitch seat vibration to the head. Economics, 1994, 37, pp. 1513–1531.

23.

Paddan

G.S.

and Griffin

M.J.

Transmission of yaw seat vibration to the head. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2000, Vol. 229, No. 5, pp. 1077–1095.

24.

Demic

Lukic

and Milic

Some aspects of the investigation of random vibration influence on ride comfort. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2002, Vol. 253, No. 1, pp. 109–129.

25.

Nawayseh

and Griffin

M.J.

Tri-axial forces at the seat and backrest during whole-body vertical vibration. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004, Vol. 277, No. 1-2, pp. 309–326.

26.

Mansfield

N.J.

and Griffin

M.J.

(2000). Non-linearities in apparent mass and transmissibility during exposure to whole-body vertical vibration. Journal of Biomechanics, 2000, 33, Vol. 933–941.

27.

International Standard for Standardization. Mechanical vibration — Laboratory method for evaluating vehicle seat vibration — Specifications of dynamic dummies for z-axis motion. ISO-WD-108/4 N392, 2002.

28.

Lewis

C.H.

and Griffin

M.J.

Predicting the effects of vibration frequency, and axis, and seating conditions on the reading of numeric displays. Economics, 1980, 23, pp. 485–501.

29.

Griffin

M.J.

Handbook of Human Vibration, Academic Press Limited, London, 1990.

30.

Woodman

P.D.

The influence of skin tissue on the relative motion between the head and a helmet. United Kingdom Conference on Human Response to Vibration, September, pp. 18–20, 1995.

31.

Woodman

P.D.

The effect of the head-helmet coupling on the relative acceleration between head and helmet. United Kingdom Conference on Human Response to Vibration, September, pp. 18–20, 1996.

32.

Smith

S.D.

. Helmet system performance in vibration environments. United Kingdom Conference on Human Response to Vibration, September, pp. 13–15, 2000.

33.

Bendat

J.S.

and Piersol

A.G.

Random data-analysis and measurement procedures. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.

34.

Munro

H.B.

Statistical methods for health care research. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1997.

35.

Mandapuram

S.C.

Rakheja

Demont

R.G.

and Boileau

P-É.

Influence of back support conditions on the apparent mass of seated occupants under horizontal vibration. Industrial Health, 2005, 43, pp. 421–435.

36.

Wang

Rakheja

, and Boileau

P.-É.

The role of seat geometry and posture on the mechanical energy absorption characteristics of seated occupants under vertical vibration. International Journal of Industrial Economics, 2006, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 171–184.