Abstract
Zhenze Li1,*, Takeshi Katsumi1, Toru Inui1, Shigeyoshi Imaizumi2, (1) GSGES, Kyoto University, Sakyo, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan., (2) Department of Advanced Interdisciplinary Science, Utsunomiya University, Yoto, Utsunomiya 321-8585, Japan.
Adsorption Science & Technology (2010) Vol. 28, No. 5, pp. 419–435.
On page 433, Table 3 should be as follows:
Adsorption Capacities and Affinities of Various Adsorbents
Adsorbent
Adsorption capacity (mg g−1)
Adsorption affinity (l mg−1)
Reference
Aerobic granules functionalized with polyethylenimine
401.5
7.6 ∞ 10−3
Sun et al. (2010)
Amino-functionalized mesoporous silica
109.6
4.4 ∞ 10−3
Li et al. (2008)
Sawdust-activated carbon
44.0
0.2215
Karthikeyan et al. (2005)
Layered double hydroxides
31.2
2.7 ∞ 10−4
Das et al. (2004)
Humic acid extracted from coal
20.8
–
Arslan et al. (2010)
Carbon nano-tube
20.56
–
Di et al. (2004)
Granular activated carbon
7.0
–
Di Natale et al. (2007)
Magnetic Fe3O4 nano- particles
2.95
–
Begum and Anantharaman (2009)
Bentonite
0.052
–
Khan et al. (1995)
Wood char (200 °C)
31.96
1.45 ∞ 10−2
This study
Ferric-laden char
53.45
1.3 ∞ 10−3
This study
