BrownL.C.FunkJ.F. and ShowalterS.K. (2000), Initial screening of thermochemical water-splitting cycles for high efficiency generation of hydrogen fuels using nuclear power, University of Kentucky and Sandia National Laboratories, General Atomics Project 30047 (April 2000).
2.
CampbellC.J. and LaherrèreJ.H. (1998), The end cheap oil, Scientific American, March 1998.
3.
CanonJ. (1997), Clean hydrogen transportation-A market opportunity for renewable energy, Renewable Energy Policy Project Issue Brief, April 1997, n.°7. At http://www.repp.org/articles/issuebr7/issuebr7.html
FisherJ.C. and PryR.H. (1970), A simple substitution model of technological change, General Electric Research and Development Center, Report N.° 70-C- 215, June 1970.
6.
HarrisonDavidJr. and RadovD.B. (2002), Evaluation of alternative initial allocation mechanisms in a European Union Greenhouse gas emissions allowance trading scheme, National Economic Research Associates, report prepared for DG Environment, European Commission.
7.
HerzogH.EliassonB. and KaarstadO. (2000), Capturing greenhouse gases, Scientific American February2000, 54–61.
MarchettiC. (1977), Primary energy substitution models: On the interaction between Energy and Society, Technological Forecasting and Social Change10, 345–356.
10.
MarchettiC. (1987), The future of natural gas – A darwinian analysis, Technological Forecasting and Social Change31, 155–171.
11.
MarchettiC. (2000), On decarbonization: Historically and perspectively, paper presented at OECD, Paris 2–3 October.
12.
MarlandG.BodenT.A. and AndresR.J. (2001), Global CO2 emissions from fossil fuel burning, cement manufacture, and gas flaring: 1751–1998, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee (July 25, 2001). Available at http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov/ftp/ndp030/global98.ems
13.
NifeneckerH. and HufferE. (2001), Global warming or nuclear waste – which do we want?Europhysics News, March/April, 52–55, 2001.
14.
FredSinger S. (1999), Human Contribution to Climate Change Remains Questionable, EOS, Transactions, American Geophysical Society80: 183–187, April 20.
15.
SingerS.F. (1999), The scientific case against the Global Climate Treaty, a report from the Science & Environmental Policy Project, Fairfax, Virgínia. At http://www.sepp.org.
16.
SteinbergM. and BaronS. (1976), Synthetic carbonaceous fuel and feedstock using nuclear power, air and water, Proceedings of the First World Hydrogen Energy Conference, Miami Beach (Florida) 1–3 March.
17.
SteinfeldA.BrackM.MeierA.WeidenkaffA. and WuilleminD. (1998), A solar chemical reactor for the co-production of zinc and synthesis gas, Energy- The International Journal23 (10), 803–814.
18.
SternD.I. and KaufmannR.K. (1996), Estimates of global anthropogenic methane emissions 1860–1993, Chemosphere33: 159–76.