Commercial ultrasound systems can make a number of measurements related to haemodynamics which are relevant to clinical practice and to clinical research. These include maximum velocity, volumetric flow and wall shear rate. Using appropriate protocols, measurements can be made averaged over the cardiac cycle, or as a function of time through the cardiac cycle. Maximum velocity underpins most of these measurements. Maximum velocity is overestimated as a result of geometric spectral broadening, by typically up to 30%, but by much larger amounts as the angle approaches 90°. Though not used in clinical practice, a simple correction technique using a string phantom can substantially reduce these errors. For volumetric flow and wall shear rate, methods such as specialist multi-gate ultrasound systems, magnetic resonance imaging and image guided modelling are available. Before resorting to these more complex methods users might consider that, with care and attention to procedure, high quality information may be obtained using commercial ultrasound systems. Manufacturers could make more use of the colour flow image for quantification of velocity, and adopt vector Doppler techniques.
NASCET collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. New Eng J Med1991;325:445–53
2.
ECST collaborators. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet1998;351:379–87
3.
ACAS. Executive committee for the asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA1995;273:142
4.
ACST. MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet2004;363:1491
5.
OatesCP, NaylorAR, HartshorneT, Joint recommendations for reporting carotid ultrasound investigations in the United Kingdom. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2009;37:251–61
6.
BluthEI, StavrosAT, MarichKW, AufrichtigD, MarichKW, BakerJD. Carotid duplex sonography: a multicenter recommendation for standardised imaging and Doppler criteria. Radiographics1988;8:487–506
7.
GrantEG, BensonCB, MonetaGL, Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis – Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. Radiology2003;229:340–6
8.
DaigleRJ, StavrosAT, LeeRM. Overestimation of velocity and frequency values by multi-element linear array Dopplers. J Vasc Technol1990;14:206–13
9.
HoskinsPR, LiSL, McDickenWN. Velocity estimation using duplex scanners. Ultrasound Med Biol1991;17:195–9
10.
HoskinsPR. Accuracy of maximum velocity estimates made using Doppler ultrasound systems. Br J Radiol1996;69:172–7
11.
FillingerMF, BakerRJ, ZwolakRM, Carotid duplex criteria for a 60% or greater angiographic stenosis: variation according to equipment. J Vasc Surg1996;24:856–64
12.
LogasonK, BarlinT, JonssonML, The importance of Doppler angle of insonation on differentiation between 50–69% and 70–99% carotid artery stenosis. Euro Vasc Endovasc Surg2001;21:311–3
13.
JogestrandT, LindqvistM, NowakJ. Diagnostic performance of duplex ultrasonography in the detection of high grade internal carotid artery stenosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2002;23:510–8
14.
TolaM, YurdakulM. Effect of Doppler angle in diagnosis of internal carotid artery stenosis. J Ultrasound Med2006;25:1187–92
15.
AlexandrovAV, VitalD, BrodieDS, HamiltonP, GrottaJC. Grading carotid stenosis with ultrasound – An interlaboratory comparison. Stroke1997;28:1208–10
16.
ThomasN, TaylorP, PadayacheeS. The impact of theoretical errors on velocity estimation and accuracy of duplex grading of carotid stenosis. Ultrasound Med Biol2002;28:191–6
HoskinsPR, MartinK, ThrushA, eds. Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and Equipment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010
19.
NewhouseVL, FurgasonES, JohnsonGF, WolfDA. The dependence of ultrasound Doppler bandwidth on beam geometry. IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrasonics1980;27:50–9
20.
GuidiG, LicciardelloC, FalteriS. Intrinsic spectral broadening (ISB) in ultrasound Doppler as a combination of transit time and local geometrical broadening. Ultrasound Med Biol2000;26:853–62
21.
HoskinsPR, McDickenWN. An investigation of simulated umbilical artery Doppler waveforms I. The effect of physical parameters on the maximum frequency envelope and on indices derived from the maximum frequency envelope. Ultrasound Med Biol1991;17:7–21
22.
HoskinsPR, FishPJ, PyeSD, AndersonT. Finite beam width ray model of geometric spectral broadening. Ultrasound Med Biol1999a;25:391–404
23.
FishPJ. Non stationarity broadening in pulsed Doppler ultrasound recordings. I: the effect of ultrasonic spectrum measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol1991;17:147–55
24.
HoskinsPR. A comparison of single and dual beam methods for maximum velocity estimation. Ultrasound Med Biol1999b;25:583–92
25.
FraserKH, MeagherS, BlakeJR, EassonWJ, HoskinsPR. Characterisation of an abdominal aortic velocity waveform in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ultrasound Med Biol2008;34:73–80
26.
BlakeJR, MeagherSC, FraserKH, EassonWJ, HoskinsPR. A method to estimate wall shear rate with clinical ultrasound scanners. Ultrasound Med Biol2008;34:760–74
27.
DunmireB, BeachKW, LabsKH, PlettM, StrandnessDE. Cross-beam vector Doppler ultrasound for angle-independent velocity measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol2000;26:1213–35
28.
SteelR, DavidsonF, HoskinsPR, FishPJ. Angle-independent estimation of maximum velocity through stenoses using vector Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol2003;29:575–84
29.
TortoliP, MorgantiT, BambiG, PalomboC, RamnarineKV. Noninvasive simultaneous assessment of wall shear rate and wall distension in carotid arteries. Ultrasound Med Biol2006;32:1661–70
30.
ThrushAJ, EvansDH. Intrinsic spectral broadening: a potential cause of misdiagnosis of carotid artery disease. J Vasc Invest1995;1:187–92
31.
LuiEYL, SteinmanAH, CobboldRSC, JohnstonKW. Human factors as a source of error in peak Doppler velocity measurement. J Vasc Surg2005;42:972–9
32.
SteinmanAH, TavakkoliJ, MyersJG, CobboldRSC, JohnstonKW. Sources of error in maximum velocity estimation using linear phased-array Doppler systems with steady flow. Ultrasound Med Biol2001;27:655–64
33.
SteinmanAH, YuACH, JohnstonKW, CobboldSC. Effects of beam steering in pulsed-wave ultrasound velocity estimation. Ultrasound Med Biol2005;31:1073–82
34.
LandwehrP, SchindlerR, HeinrichU, Quantification of vascular stenosis with color Doppler flow imaging: in vitro investigations. Radiology1991;17:701–4
35.
BranasCC, WeingattenMS, CzeredarczukM, SchaferPF. Examination of carotid arteries with quantitative color Doppler flow imaging. J Ultrasound Med1994;13:121–7
36.
HoskinsPR. Peak velocity estimation in arterial stenosis models using colour vector Doppler. Ultrasound Med Biol1997;23:889–97
37.
ForsbergF, SteinAD, MertonDA. Carotid stenosis assessed with a 4Dimensional semiautomated Doppler system. J Ultrasound Med2008;27:1337–44
38.
EvansDH, McDickenWN. Doppler Ultrasound: Physics, Instrumentation and Signal Processing. Chichester: Wiley, 2000
39.
EvansDH. On the measurement of the mean velocity of blood flow over the cardiac cycle using Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol1985;11:735–41
40.
WomersleyJR. Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. J Physiol1955;127:553–63
41.
LiSF, HoskinsPR, AndersonT, McDickenWN. Measurement of mean velocity during pulsatile flow using time averaged maximum frequency of Doppler ultrasound waveforms. Ultrasound Med Biol1993;19:105–13
42.
HoskinsPR, AndersonT, InglisS, FortuneS, SoldanM, PlevrisJ. Validation of endoscopic ultrasound measured flow rate in the azygos vein using a flow phantom. Ultrasound Med Biol2010;36:1957–64
43.
HoldsworthDW, NorleyCJD, FrayneR, SteinmanDA, RuttBK. Characterization of common carotid artery blood-flow waveforms in normal human subjects. Physiol Meas1999;20:219–40
44.
DeaneCR, MarkusHS. Colour velocity flow measurement: in vitro validation and application to human carotid arteries. Ultrasound Med Biol1997;23:447–52
45.
StruijkPC, StewartPA, FernandoKL, Wall shear stress and related hemodynamic parameters in the fetal descending aorta derived from color Doppler velocity profiles. Ultrasound Med Biol2005;31:1441–50
46.
PicotPA, FruitmanM, RankinRN, FensterA. Rapid volume flow rate estimation using transverse colour Doppler Imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol1995;21:1199–209
47.
GuoZY, MoreauM, RickeyDW, PicotPA, FensterA. Quantitative investigation of in-vitro flow using 3-dimensional color Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol1995;21:807–16
48.
IrvineT, LiXN, MoriY, A digital 3-dimensional method for computing great artery flows: in vitro validation studies. J Am Soc Echocardiog2000;13:841–8
49.
ForsbergF, SteinA, LiuJ, Validating volume flow measurements from a novel semiautomated four-dimensional Doppler ultrasound scanner. Acad Radiol2006;13:1204–10
GiddensDP, ZarinsCK, GlagovS. The role of fluid mechanics in the localization and detection of atherosclerosis. J Biomech Eng – Trans ASME1993;115:588–94
54.
CaroCG, Fitz-GeraldJM, SchroterRC. Atheroma and arterial wall shear. Observation, correlation and proposal of a shear dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis. Proc Royal Soc Lond Biol Sci1971;177:109–59
55.
SlagerCJ, WentzelJK, GijsenFJH, The role of shear stress in the generation of rupture-prone vulnerable plaques. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med2005;2:401–7
56.
SlagerCJ, WentzelJJ, GijsenFJH, The role of shear stress in the destabilization of vulnerable plaques and related therapeutic implications. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med2005;2:456–64
57.
SimonAC, LevensonJ. Abnormal wall shear conditions in the brachial artery of hypertensive patients. J Hypertens1990;8: 109–14
58.
HofstraL, BergmansDCJJ, LeunissenKML, Anastomotic intimal hyperplasia in prosthetic arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis is associated with initial high flow velocity and not with mismatch in elastic properties. J Am Soc Nephrol1995;6:1625–33
59.
GnassoA, CaralloC, IraceC, Association between intima-media thickness and wall shear stress in common carotid arteries in healthy male subjects. Circulation1996;94:3257–62
60.
JiangY, KoharaK, HiwadaK. Low wall shear stress contributes to atherosclerosis of the carotid artery in hypertensive patients. Hypertens Res – Clin Exp1999;22:203–7
61.
IraceC, CorteseC, FiaschiE, CaralloC, FarinaroE, GnassoA. Wall shear stress is associated with intima-media thickness and carotid atherosclerosis in subjects at low coronary heart disease risk. Stroke2004;35:464–8
62.
SpringS, van der LooB, KriegerE, Amann-VestiBR, RoussonV, KoppensteinerR. Decreased wall shear stress in the common carotid artery of patients with peripheral arterial disease or abdominal aortic aneurysm: relation to blood rheology, vascular risk factors, and intima-media thickness. J Vasc Surg2006;43: 56–63
63.
ChironiGN, SimonA, BokovP, LevensonJ. Correction of carotid intima-media thickness for adaptive dependence on tensile stress: implication for cardiovascular risk assessment. J Clin Ultrasound2009;37:270–5
64.
LindL, AnderssonJ, LarssonA, SandhagenB. Shear stress in the common carotid artery is related to both intima-media thickness and echogenecity. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc2009;43:299–308
65.
KohlerU, MarshallI, RobertsonMB, LongQ, XuY, HoskinsPR. MRI measurement of wall shear stress in bifurcation models and comparison with CFD predictions. J Mag Reson Imaging2001;14:563–73
66.
HoskinsPR, HardmanD. 3D imaging and computational modelling for estimation of wall stress in diseased arteries. Brit J Radiol2009;82:S3–S17
67.
TortoliP, DallaiA, BoniE, FrancalanciL, RicciS. An automatic angle tracking procedure for feasible vector Doppler blood velocity measurements. Ultrasound Med Biol2010;36:488–96
68.
BrandsPJ, HoeksAPG, HofstraL, RenemanRS. Noninvasive method to estimate wall shear rate using ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol1995;21:171–85
69.
RenemanRS, ArtsT, HoeksAPG. Wall shear stress – an important determinant of endothelial cell function and structure – in the arterial system in vivo. J Vasc Res2006;43:251–69
70.
ForsbergF, MorvayZ, RawoolNM, DeaneCR, NeedlemanL. Shear rate estimation using a clinical ultrasound scanner. J Ultrasound Med2000;19:323–7
71.
DammersR, StifftF, TordoirJHM, Shear stress depends on vascular territory: comparison between common carotid and brachial artery. J Appl Physiol2002;94:485–9
72.
FordMD, XieYYJ, WassermanBA, SteinmanDA. Is flow in the common carotid artery fully developed?Physiol Meas2008;29:1335–49
