Musculoskeletal Ultrasound: Audit of Sonographer Reporting

Abstract

Musculoskeletal (MSK) ultrasound performed by non-medical practitioners is a developing practice. The aim of this paper is: (1) to audit an experienced sonographer's (SJR) performance after one year's independent reporting against two experienced MSK radiologists (CJG, MC); and (2) to establish an audit standard against which such role development might be contrived. Images and reports from 250 MSK ultrasound examinations performed by a sonographer (SJR) were reviewed independently by two consultant MSK radiologists (CJG and MC). The examinations were graded for discrepancy, e.g. grade 1 – agree with the sonographer report; grade 2 – minor discrepancy unlikely to alter patient care; grade 3 – potentially significant discrepancy; grade 4 – definite, significant discrepancy likely to have adverse consequences for patient care. Two of 250 (0.8%) cases were excluded. Both radiologists agreed completely with the sonographer (grade 1) in 235 of the 248 cases (94.8%). In 13 cases there was discrepancy between the reports of SJR and the radiologists. The discrepancy was grade 2 in six of the 248 cases (2.4%), grade 3 in six of the 248 cases (2.4%) and grade 4 in one of the 248 cases (0.4%). In conclusion, this audit shows a high level of agreement between the sonographer and the consultant MSK radiologist reporting of MSK ultrasound. This level of agreement may set the standard for future quality assurance audit of sonographer MSK reporting.