Increasing access to professional care during labour and delivery is the central strategy in Nepal's commitment to reducing its maternal mortality ratio. This paper outlines a number of complementary interventions used by the Nepal Safer Motherhood Project to address the negative attitudes prevalent among service providers, which is a contributing factor to the under-utilization of the health-care services. The perspectives of the community and the service providers are presented, with a discussion of the importance of effective communication, the establishment of positive relationships and a demonstration of the critical role of local ownership and involvement in bringing about a positive change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
World Health Organization. The World Health Report: Make Every Mother and Child Count. Geneva: WHO, 2005
2.
FurberAS. Referral to Hospital in Nepal: Four Years' Experiences in one Rural District. Trop Doct2002;32:75–8
3.
PittrofR, CampbellO. Quality of Maternity Care – Silver Bullet or Red Herring?London: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 2000
4.
BruceJ. Quality of care: fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework. Stud Fam Plan1990;21:61–91
5.
D'AmbruosoL, AbbeyM, HusseinJ. Please understand when I cry out in pain: women's accounts of maternity services during labour and delivery in Ghana. BMC Public Health2005;5:140
6.
Ministry of Health. Demographic and Health Survey 1996. Kathmandu, Government of Nepal, 1997
7.
Ministry of Health. Demographic and Health Survey 2006. Kathmandu, Government of Nepal, 2007
8.
UNICEF. Needs Assessment on the Availability of Emergency Obstetric Care Services. Kathmandu: UNICEF, 2002
9.
Ministry of Health. Health Management Information System 1997. Kathmandu, Government of Nepal
10.
ThaddeusD. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Social Sci Med1994;38:1091–110
11.
CrowR, GageH, HampsonS, The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technol Assess2002;6:1–244
12.
World Bank. Department for International Development. Unequal Citizens. Kathmandu, Nepal: World Bank, 2006
13.
SchulerS, McIntoshE, GoldsteinM, PandeB. Barriers to effective family planning in Nepal. Stud Fam Plann1985;16:260–70
14.
World Bank. Understanding the Access, Demand and Utilisation of Health Services by Rural Women in Nepal and their Constraints. Kathmandu: World Bank, 2001
15.
Organisation Development Centre. Study on Quality of Care Approach in Selected Health Facilities of Nepal for Nepal Safer Motherhood Project. London: Options, 2004
16.
Institute of Medicine. Utilisation Study of Emergency Obstetric Care in Selected Districts of Nepal. London: Options, 2004
17.
AbbattJ. Challenging Ke Garne: experiences of Nepal Safer Motherhood Project, London, 1999
ClaphamS, BasnettI, PathakLR, McCallM. The evolution of a quality of care approach for improving emergency obstetric care in rural Hospitals in Nepal. Int J Gynaecol Obstet2004;86:86–97
21.
MacDonaghS, MurrayS, EnsorT. Examining the Role of Private Maternity Services: A Synthesis of Findings from Three Community Case Studies. London: Options, 2003
22.
AitkenJM. Voices from Inside: Managing District Health Services in Nepal. Int J Health Plan Manage1994;9:309–40
23.
PriceN, PokharelD. Using key informant monitoring in the safe motherhood programme in Nepal. Dev Pract2005;15:151–63
24.
CooperiderDL, SorensenPF, YaegerTF, WhitneyD, eds. Appreciative Inquiry: An Emerging Direction for Organisation Development. Champaign ILStipes Publishing, 2001
25.
HodgsonR, KhatiP, BaduK, KarthakC, ParajuliM. ‘Artistry of the Invisible’: Evaluation of ‘Foundation for Change’ – a Change Management Process. London: Options, and Family Health Division, Ministry of Health, Kathmandu, 2003
26.
ThomasD, MesserschmidtKC, MesserschmidtD, DevkotaB. Increasing Access to Essential Obstetric Care: A Review of Progress and Process. London: Options, 2004
27.
RonsmansC. How can we monitor progress towards improved maternal health in safe motherhood strategies? A review of the evidence. Stud Health Serv Policy2001;17:317–42
28.
SlavinH, MurraySF, AitkenJM, Output to Purpose Review: Nepal Safer Motherhood Project. John Snow International, London, 2000
29.
HawkinsK, PriceN. The Peer Ethnographic Tool for Social Appraisal and Monitoring of Sexual and Reproductive Health Programmes. Swansea Centre for Development Studies, University of Wales, 2000
30.
PokharelD. Implementation of Key Informant Monitoring. London: Options and Family Health Division, Ministry of Health, Kathmandu, 2004
31.
Nepal Safer Motherhood Project and Family Health Division. Department of Health Services. Using Film Research for Community Needs Assessment. Video. Kathmandu, Nepal, 1997
32.
Nepal Safer Motherhood Project and Family Health Division, Department of Health Services. Safe Motherhood in Nepal. Video. Kathmandu, Nepal, 2000
33.
AdikaryK. Qualitative Investigation of Nepal Safer Motherhood Project's Radio Programme Initiated in Surkhet District. London: Options, 2004
34.
Ministry of Health (and Population), Health Management Information System. Monitoring information 1997/1998 to 2003/2004
35.
Ministry of Health (and Population), Health Management Information System. Monitoring information 1999/00 to 2003/04
