LuCY. Observational studies: a review of study designs, challenges and strategies to reduce confounding. Int J Clin Pract2009;63:691–7
2.
BabyakMA. Understanding confounding and mediation. Evid Based Mental Health2009;12:68–71
3.
van StralenKJ, DekkerFW, ZoccaliC, JagerKJ. Confounding. Nephron Clin Pract2010;116:c143–7
4.
TripepiG, JagerKJ, DekkerFW, ZoccaliC. Stratification for confounding – Part 1: the Mantel–Haenszel formula. Nephron CLin Pract2010;116:c317–21
5.
CocchiG, GualdiS, BowerC, International trends of Down syndrome 1993–2004: Births in relation to maternal age and terminations of pregnancies. Birth Defects Res (Part A)2010;88:474–9
6.
WilliamsonE, MorleyR, LucasA, CarpenterJ. Propensity scores: from nave enthusiasm to intuitive understanding. Stat Methods Med Res2011Jan 24. [Epub ahead of print]
7.
RosenbaumPR, RubinDB. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc1984;79:516–24
HarrellFE. Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear modeling, logistic regression and survival analysis. New York, USA: Springer–Verlag New York Inc, 2001
10.
ClarkA, HarveyI, FowkesFGR. Epidemiology and risk factors for varicose veins among older peoples: cross-sectional population study in the UK. Phlebology2010;25:236–40
