Abstract
Objective
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) still remains a significant public health problem due to gaps between recommendations and clinical practice in VTE prophylaxis. This is the first clinical study designed to evaluate the applicability of a standard ‘VTE prophylaxis and risk factor assessment form (VTE-PRAF)’ and prescription of VTE prophylaxis among hospitalized patients in the daily practice of general surgeons in Turkey.
Method
A total of 1472 patients (mean age: 52.4 ± 16.9 years; 50.6% were men) were included in cross-sectional (
Results
While 62.1% of patients were identified to be at ‘high+ highest’ risk, prophylaxis was evident only for 65.9%. Utilization of the form was higher in the second longitudinal phase (
Conclusion
Based on the use of prophylaxis only for 65.9% of general surgery inpatients at high risk for VTE, low use of prophylaxis is assumed to remain a significant threat to public health across Turkey. Inclusion of a standard VTE-PRAF in the hospital protocol seems to raise clinical awareness of VTE risk assessment and appropriate management in VTE which otherwise well-known to be associated with significant mortality and morbidity. Impact of e-VTE-PRAF is worth investigating.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
