To review the evidence regarding interventions (compression, sclerotherapy, surgery and endoluminal) for uncomplicated venous disease.
Method
A literature search of MEDLINE and EMBASE was performed. In addition, bibliographies of published data and the Cochrane Peripheral Vascular Review Group Specialist Register were examined. Publications describing an intervention for uncomplicated venous disease or trials comparing one intervention against another were considered.
Results
Uncomplicated but symptomatic varicose veins are associated with a significant reduction in quality of life (QoL). Evaluation must include a detailed history and examination supported by non-invasive imaging. Although HHD is useful, its utility is limited in the popliteal fossa. It can not provide morphological/anatomical detail when considering an endoluminal treatment option. Regardless of intervention, all treatments considered are associated with a significant improvement in QoL at acceptable cost.
Conclusion
Uncomplicated symptomatic varicose veins lead to a reduced QoL, which can be significantly improved by all interventions considered.
CallamM.Epidemiology of varicose veins.Br J Surg1994; 81: 167–73.
2.
GallandRB, WhattlingPJ, CookTJ, MageeTR.Regional variation in varicose veins operations.Ann R Coll Surg Engl2000; 82: 275–93.
3.
BrandFN, DannenbergAL, AbbottRd, KannelWB.The epidemiology of varicose veins: the Framingham Study.Am J Prev Med1988; 4: 96–101.
4.
BeagleholeR, PriorIAM, SalmondCE, DavidsonF.Varicose veins in the South Pacific.Int J Epidemiol1975; 4: 295–99.
5.
MekkyS, SchillingRSF, WalfordJ.Varicose veins in women cotton workers: an epidemiological study in England and Egypt.Br Med J1969; 2: 591–5.
6.
Beebe-DimmerJL, PfeiferJR, EngleJS, SchottenfeldD.The epidemiology of chronic venous disease and varicose veins.Ann Epidemol2005; 15: 175–84.
7.
HarrisMR, DaviesRJ, BrownS, JonesSM, EyersPS, ChesterJF.Surgical treatment of varicose veins: effect of rationing.Ann R Coll Surg Engl2006; 88: 37–9.
8.
OudhoffJP, TimmermansDR, RietbergM, KnolDL, van der WalG.The acceptability of waiting times for elective general surgery and the appropriateness of prioritizing patients.BMC Health Serv Res2007; 7: 32
9.
PorterJM, MonetaGL.Reporting standards in venous disease: an update.J Vasc Surg1995; 21: 635–45.
10.
YancopoulosGD, KlagsburnM, FolkmanJ.Vaculogenesis angiogenesis and growth factors: Ephrins enter the fray at the border.Cell1998; 93: 661–4.
CooperDG, Hillmoon-CooperCS, BarkerSGE, HollingsworthSJ.Primary varicose veins: the sapheno-femoral junction, distribution of varicosities and patterns of incompetence.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2003; 25: 53–9.
13.
Beebe-DimmerJL, PfeiferJR, EngleJS, SchottenfeldD.The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins.Ann Epidemol2005; 15: 175–84.
14.
BachooP, WolfB, EngesetJ.Venous valve surgery. In: Update in Vascular Surgery.London: European Association of Surgical Sciences. Foxwell & Davies Ltd, 2001: 155–162.
15.
BradburyAW, EvansCJ, AllanPL, LeeAJ, RuckleyCV, FowkesFGR.What are the symptoms of varicose veins? Edinburgh vein study cross sectional population survey.Br Med J1999; 318: 353–6.
16.
LeesTA, BeardJD, RidlerBMF, SzmanskaT.A survey of the current management of varicose veins by members of the Vascular Surgical Society.Ann R Coll Surg Engl1999; 81: 407–17.
17.
MakrisSA, KarkosCD, AwadS, LondonNJ.An all comers venous duplex scan policy for patients with lower limb varicose veins attending a one stop vascular clinic: is it justified?Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2006; 32: 718–24.
18.
SeidelAC, MirandaF, JulianoY, NovoNF, dos SantosJH, de SouzaDF.Prevalence of varicose veins and venous anatomy in patients without truncal saphenous reflux.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2004; 28: 387–90.
19.
VanRij, AndreM, JonesGT, HillGB, JiangP.Neovascularisation and recurrent varicose veins: more histologic and ultrasound evidence.J Vasc Surg2004; 40: 296–302.
20.
DarkeSG, VetrivelS, FoyDM, SmithS, BarkerS.A comparison of duplex scanning and continous wave Doppler in the assessment of primary and uncomplicated varicose veins.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg1997; 14: 457–61.
21.
UhlJ-F, GillotC.Embryology and three-dimensional anatomy of the superficial venous system of the lower limbs.Phlebology2007; 22: 194–206.
22.
MyersKA, ZiegenbeinRW, ZengGH, MathewsPG.Duplex ultrasonography scanning for chronic venous disease: patterns of venous reflux.J Vasc Surg1995; 21: 605–12.
23.
PichotO, SessaC, BossonJL.Duplex imaging analysis of the long saphenous vein reflux: basis for strategy of endovenous obliteration treatment.Int Angiol2002; 21: 333–6.
24.
HorrocksE, RoakeJ, LewisD.Best practice for assessment of patients with varicose veins.N Z Med J2008; 121: 42–9.
25.
O'HareJL, VandenbroeckWB, CampbellG, HeatherB, EarnshawJJ.A prospective evaluation of the outcome after small saphenous varicose vein surgery with one year follow up.J Vasc Surg2008; 48: 669–73.
26.
OinonenA, LehtolaA, SuganoN, AlbackA, LepantaloM.Communicating Doppler derived information in superficial venous surgery.Phlebology2007; 22: 137–41.
27.
BlomgrenL, JohanssonG, BergqvistD.Quality of life after surgery for varicose veins and the impact of preoperative duplex: results based on a randomized trial.Ann Vasc Surg2006; 20: 30–4.
28.
WinterbornRJ, FoyC, HeatherBP, EarnshawJJ.Randomised trial of flush saphenofemoral ligation for primary great saphenous varicose veinsEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2008; 36: 477–84.
29.
KentPJ, WestonMJ.Duplex scanning may be used selectively in patients with primary varicose veins.Ann R Coll Surg Engl1998; 80: 388–93.
30.
HirschSA, DillavouE.Options in the management of varicose veins.J. Cardiovasc Surg2008; 49: 19–26.
31.
CavezziA, LabropoulosN, PartschH.Duplex ultrasound investigation of the veins in chronic venous disease of the lower limbs - UIP consensus document. Part 2. Anatomy.VASA2007; 36: 62–71.
32.
SarinS, SommervilleK, FarrahJ, ScurrJH, Coleridge SmithPD.Duplex ultrasonography for assessment of venous valvular function of the lower limb.Br J Surg1995; 82: 855–6.
33.
PittalugaP, ChastanetS, ReaB, BarbeR.Classification of saphenous refluxes: implications for treatment.Phlebology2008; 23: 2–9.
34.
WHO.Basic Documents.Geneva: WHO, 1976
35.
WHO. Uses of epidemiology in ageing, 1984. Reports of a scientific Group, 1983. Technical Report Series.Geneva: WHO, 706
36.
Van KorlarrI, VossenC, RosendaalF, CameronL, BovillE, KapteinA.Quality of life in venous disease.Thromb Haemost2003; 90: 27–35.
37.
GarrattAM, MacdonaldLM, RutaDA, RussellIT, BuckinghamJK, KrukowskiZH.Towards measurement of outcome for patients with varicose veins.Qual Health Care1993; 2: 5–10.
38.
CallumMJ, HarperDR, DaleJJ, RuckleyCV.Chronic ulceration of the leg: extent of the problem and provision of care.Br Med J1985; 290: 1855–6.
39.
NicolaidesAN.Edema in chronic venous insufficiency and the effect of modern pharmacotherapy.Angiology2000; 51: 1–2.
40.
SmithJJ, GarrattAM, GuestM, GreenhalghRM, DaviesAH.Evaluating and improving health-related quality of life in patients with varicose veins.Vasc Surg1999; 30: 710–9.
41.
VanhouttePM, CorcaudS, de MontrionC.Venous disease: from pathophysiology to quality of life.Angiology1997; 48: 559–67.
42.
GuexJJ, MyonE, DidierL, Nguyen LeC, TaiebC.Chronic venous disease: health status of a population and care impact on this health status through quality of life questionnaires.Int Angiol2005; 24: 258–64.
43.
AbenhaimL, KurzX, for the VEINES Group. The VEINES study (VEnous, INsufficiency Epidemiologic and Economic Study): an international cohort study on chronic venous disorders of the leg.Angiology1997; 48: 59–66.
44.
SamRC, DarvallKAL, AdamDJ, SilvermanSH, Bradbury AndrewW.A comparison of the changes in generic quality of life after superficial venous surgery with those after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.J Vasc Surg2006; 44: 606–10.
45.
MacKenzieRK, PaisleyA, AllanPL, LeeAJ, RuckleyCV, BradburyAW.The effect of long saphenous vein stripping on quality of life.Vasc Surg2002; 35: 1197–203.
46.
BiswasS, ClarkA, ShieldsDA.Randomised clinical trial of the duration of compressive therapy after varicose vein surgery.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2007; 33: 641–7.
47.
SomervilleJJF, BrowGO, BrynePJ, QuillRD, FeganWG.The effect of elastic stockings on superficial venous pressure in patients with venous insufficiencyBr J Surg1974; 61: 979–81.
48.
Van GeestAJ, VeraartJCJM, NelemansP, NeumanHAM.The effect of medical compression stockings with different slope values on edema measurements underneath three different types of stockings.Dermatol Surg2000; 26: 244–47.
49.
MichaelsJA, CampbellWB, BrazierJE.Randomised clinical trial, observational study and assessment of cost effectiveness of the treatment of varicose veins (REACTIV trial).Health Technol assess2006; 10: 1–196.
50.
SiggK.The treatment of varicosities and accompanying complications.Angiology1952; 3: 255–79.
51.
HenryMEF, FeganWG, PegumJM.Five year survey of the treatment of varicose ulcers.Br Med J1971; 2: 493–4.
52.
Hamel-DesnosC, OuvryP, BenigniJ-P.Comparison of 1% and 3% polidocanol foam in ultrasound guided sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein: a randomised, double-blind trial with two year-follow-up. ‘The 3/1 Study’.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2007; 34: 723–9.
53.
IwamotoS, IkedaM, KawasakiT, MondenM.Treatment of varicose veins: an assessment of intraoperative and postoperative compression sclerotherapy.Ann Vasc Surg2003; 17: 290–5.
54.
KahleB, LengK.Efficacy of sclerotherapy in varicose veins - prospective, blinded, placebo-controlled study.Dermatol Surg2004; 30: 723–8.
55.
RaoJ, WildemoreJK, GoldmanM, MitchelP.Double-blind prospective comparative trial between foamed and liquid polidocanol and sodium tetradecyl sulfate in the treatment of varicose and telangiectatic leg veins.Dermatol Surg2005; 31: 635
56.
ScurrJH, Coleridge SmithPD, CuttingP.Varicose veins: optimum compression following sclerotherapy.Ann R Coll Surg Engl1985; 67: 109–11.
57.
AlosJ, CarrenoP, LopezJA, EstadellaB, Serra-PratM, Marinel-LoJ.Efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy using polidocanol foam: a controlled clinical trial.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2006; 31: 101–7.
58.
BatchAJG, WickremesingheSS, GannonME, DormandyJA.Randomised trial of bandaging after sclerotherapy for varicose veins.Br Med J1980; II: 423
59.
CelenRP, Bullens-GoessensYi, Pi-Van de VenneSJ.Outcomes and side effects of duplex-guided sclerotherapy in the treatment of great saphenous veins with 1% versus 3% polidocanol foam: results of a randomized controlled trial with one-year follow-up.Dermatol Surg2007; 33: 276–81.
60.
RaoJ, WildemoreJK, GoldmanMP.Double-blind prospective comparative trial between foamed and liquid polidocanol and sodium tetradecyl sulfate in the treatment of varicose and telangiectatic leg veins.Dermatol Surg2005; 31: 631–5.
61.
GoldmanMP.Treatment of varicose and telangiectatic leg veins: double-blind prospective comparative trial between aethoxyskerol and sotradecol.Dermatol Surg2002; 28: 52–5.
62.
BukhariRH, LohrJM, PagetDS, HearnAT, CranleyRD.Evaluation of lidocaine as an analgesic when added to hypertonic saline for sclerotherapy.J. Vasc Surg1999; 29: 479–83.
63.
Hamel-DesnosC, DesnosP, WollmannJC, OuvryP, MakoS, AllaertFA.Evaluation of the efficacy of polidocanol in the form of foam compared with liquid form in sclerotherapy of the greater saphenous vein: initial results.Dermatol Surg2003; 29: 1170–5.
64.
BarrettJM, AllenB, OcklefordA, GoldmanMP.Micro-foam ultrasound guided sclerotherapy of varicose veins in 100 legs.Dermatol Surg2004; 30: 6–12.
65.
BelcaroG, CesaroneMR, Di RenzoA.Foam sclerotherapy, surgery, sclerotherapy and combined treatment for varicose veins: a 10-year, prospective, randomised, controlled trial (VEDICO Trial).Angiology2003; 54: 307–15.
66.
ChantADB, JonesHO, WeddellJM, BeresfordSAA.Varicose veins: a comparison of surgery and injection/compression sclerotherapy.Lancet1972; 2: 1188–91.
67.
EinarssonE, EklofB, NeglenP.Sclerotherapy or surgery as treatment for varicose veins - a prospective randomized study.Phlebology1993; 8: 22–6.
68.
RutgersPH, KitslaarPJ.Randomized trial of stripping versus high ligation combined with sclerotherapy in the treatment of the incompetent greater saphenous vein.Am J Surg1994; 168: 311–5.
69.
BabcockWW.A new operation for the extirpation of varicose veins of the leg.N Y Med J1907; 86: 153–6.
70.
CampbellWB, VijayKA, CollinTW, AllingtonKL, MichaelsJA.The outcome of varicose vein surgery at 10 years: clinical findings, symptoms and patient satisfaction.Ann R Coll Surg Engl2003; 85: 52–7.
71.
TennantWG, RuckleyCV.Medico-legal action following treatment for varicose veins.Br J Surg1996; 83: 291–2.
72.
BradburyAW, RuckleyCV.Varicose veins. In: BeardJD, GainsPA, eds. Vascular and Endovascular Surgery.1st edn.London: WB Saunders Company Ltd, 1998: 432–59.
73.
WolfB, BrittendenJ.Surgical treatment of varicose veins.J R Coll Surg Edinb, 2001; 46: 154–58.
74.
ThievacumarNS, DellagrammaticasD, BealeRJ, MavorAID, GoughMJ.Fate and clinical significance of saphe-nofemoral junction tributaries following endovenous laser ablation of great saphenous vein.Br J Surg2007; 94: 722–5.
75.
SarinS, ScurrJH, Coleridge-SmithPD.Stripping of the long saphenous vein in the treatment of primary varicose veins.Br J Surg1994; 81: 1455–8.
76.
DwerryhouseS, DaviesB, HarradineK, EarnshawJJ.Stripping the long saphenous vein reduces the rate of reoperation for recurrent varicose veins: five year results of a randomized trial.J Vasc Surg1999; 29: 589–92.
77.
MiyazakiN, NishibeT, SataF.Long term results of treatments for varicose veins due to greater saphenous vein insufficiency.Int Angiol2005; 24: 282–6.
78.
SubramoniaS, LeesT.Sensory abnormalities and bruising after long saphenous vein stripping: impact on short term quality of life.J Vasc Surg2005; 42: 510–4.
79.
MenyheiG, GyevnarZ, AratoE, KelemenO, KollarL.Conventional stripping versus cryostripping: a prospective randomised trial to compare improvement in quality of life and complications.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2008; 35: 218–23.
80.
LorenzD, GabelW, RedtenbacherM, WeissenhoferW, MinzlaffM, StengelD.Randomised clinical trial comparing bipolar coagulation and standard great saphenous stripping for symptomatic varicose veins.Br J Surg2007; 94: 430–40.
81.
MunasingheA, SmithC, KianfardB, PriceBA, Hold-stockJM, WhitelyMS.Strip track revascularisation after stripping of the great saphenous vein.Br J Surg2007; 94: 840–3.
82.
MuellerR.Interview with Dr. Robert Muller: father of modern day ambulatory phlebectomy, Interview by Jose A. Olivencia.Dermatol Surg1998; 24: 1147–50.
83.
CheshireN, EliasSM, KeagyB, KolvenbachR, LeahyAL, MarstonW.Powered phlebectomy (Trivex) in the treatment of varicose veins.Ann Vasc Surg2002; 16: 488–94.
84.
De ZeeuwR, WittensC, LootsM, NeumannM.Trans-illuminated powered phlebectomy accomplished by local tumescent anaesthesia in the treatment of tributary varicose veins: preliminary clinical results.Phlebology2007; 22: 90–4.
85.
ScaveeV.Transilluminated powered phlebectomy: not enough advantages? Review of the literature.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2006; 31: 316–9.
BushRG, ShamnaHN, NicholsH, HammondKA.940-nm laser for treatment of saphenous insufficiency: histological analysis long term follow up.Photomed Laser Surg2005; 23: 15–9.
89.
ParkSJ, YimSB, ChaDW, KimSC, LeeSH.Endovenous laser treatment of the small saphenous veins with a 980 nm diode laser: early results.Dermatol Surg2008; 34: 517–24.
90.
DarwoodRJ, TheivacumarN, DellagrammaticasD, MavorAI, GoughMJ.Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation with surgery for the treatment of primary great saphenous varicose veins.Br J Surg2008; 95: 294–301.
91.
TheivacumarNS, BealeRJ, MavorAID, GoughMJ.Initial experience in endovenous laser therapy ablation (EVLA) of varicose veins due to small saphenous vein reflux.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2007; 33: 614–8.
92.
MekakoAI, HatfieldJ, BryceJ, LeeD, McCollumPT, ChetterI.A non randomized controlled trial of endovenous laser therapy and surgery in the treatment of varicose veins.Ann Surg2006; 20: 451–7.
93.
MinRJ, KhilnaniN, ZimmetN, StevenE.Endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux: long term results.J Vasc Interv Radiol2003; 14: 991–6.
94.
KalteisM, BergerI, Messie-Werndl PistrichR.High ligation combined with stripping and endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein: early results of a randomized controlled trial.J. Vasc Surg2008; 47: 822–9.
95.
RasmussenLH, BjoernL, LawaetzM, BlemingsA, LawatezB, EklofB.Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: short term results.J. Vasc Surg2007; 46: 308–15.
96.
KianifardB, HoldstockJM, WhitelyMS.Radio-frequency ablation (VNUS closure) does not cause neovascularisation at the groin at one year: results of a case controlled study.J R Coll Surg Edin2006; 4: 71–4.
97.
HinchcliffeRJ, UbhiJ, BeechA, EllisonJ, BraithwaiteBD.A prospective randomized controlled trial of VNUS closure versus surgery for the treatment of recurrent long saphenous varicose veins.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2006; 31: 212–8.
98.
PuggioniA, KalraM, CarmoM, MozesG, GloviczkP.Endovenous laser therapy and radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein: analysis of early efficacy and complications.J. Vasc Surg2005; 42: 488–93.
99.
NicoliniP.Closure group. Treatment of primary varicose veins by obliteration with the VNUS closure system: results of a prospective multicentre studyEur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2005; 29: 433–9.
100.
LurieF, CretonD, EklofB.Prospective randomized study of endovenous radiofrequency obliteration versus ligation and vein stripping (EVOLVeS): two-year follow up.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2005; 29: 67–73.
