Names are powerful symbols which contribute to internal and external perceptions of an individual or institution. This paper discusses the names given to Regional Secure Units established following the Butler Report, and discusses some of the reasons underlying the choice of name. Understanding the derivation of names can assist understanding of the development of forensic psychiatry as a separate specialty and awareness of its history.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SeemanMV. Name and identity. Can J Psychiatr1980;25:129–37
2.
FalkA. Identity and name changes. Psychoanal Rev1975;62:647–57
3.
BirminghamL. Stereotypical attitudes towards Christian names and gender may influence diagnosis. Royal College of Psychiatrists Annual Meeting. 2000Edinburgh
4.
SnowdenP. A survey of the regional secure unit programme. Br J Psychiatry1985;147:499–507
5.
DeTarantoN, BesterP, PierczhniakP, McCallumA, KennedyH. Medium secure provision in the NHS and private units. J Forensic Psychiatry1998;9:369–78
6.
CoidJ, KahtanN, GaultS, CookA, JarmanB. Medium secure forensic psychiatry services: comparison of seven English health regions. Br J Psychiatry2001;178:55–61
7.
Home Office. Report of the committee on mentally abnormal offenders. HMSO, London, 1975
