BurneyIA. Bodies of Evidence: Medicine and the Politics of the English Inquest, 1830–1926. London, Johns Hopkins, 2000: 97
2.
This transformation was also evident in the Ruxton case of 1935–1936: D'CruzeS. Intimacy, professionalism and domestic homicide in interwar Britain: the case of Buck Ruxton. Women's History Review2007;16:701–722, 713
3.
The two sets of evidence were presented at the inquest on 18 July, 15 August, and 12, 19 and 26 September and the police court at Bow Street on 6, 8, 14, 21 September (both CRIM 1/117). Further medical evidence is taken from Pepper's post-mortem report (DPP 1/13/19) and Spilsbury's report of the microscope examination (DPP 1/13/23). Lay evidence was also recorded in the files of the Metropolitan Police (MEPO 3/198). All this is held at the National Archives at Kew. FilsonYoung'sThe Trial of Hawley Harvey Crippen2nd edn, William Hodge & Co, London, 1950) also contains much of this evidence
4.
5.
6.
7.
YoungF. The Trial of Hawley Harvey Crippen. 2nd edn, William Hodge & Co, London, 1950: 66–7
8.
9.
10.
11.
DewW. I Caught Crippen: Memoirs of Ex-Chief Inspector Walter Dew, CID of Scotland Yard. London, 1938: 31–2; CRIM 1/117 Marshall at police court, 29 August
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
WatsonKD. Dr Crippen. London, The National Archives, 2007:49
21.
22.
YoungF. The Trial of Hawley Harvey Crippen. 2nd edn.London, William Hodge & Co, 1950: 174
23.
24.
YoungF. The Trial of Hawley Harvey Crippen. 2nd edn.London, William Hodge & Co, 1950: 54 (Pepper), 63 (Spilsbury), 66 (Marshall)
25.
26.
27.
JonesC. Expert Witnesses: Science, Medicine, and the Practice of Law. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994: 62–3
28.
ForanDR, WillsBE, KileyBM, JacksonCB, TrestrailJH. The conviction of Dr. Crippen: new forensic findings in a century-old murder. Journal of Forensic Sciences2011;56:233–40
29.
LynchM, ColeSA, McNallyR, JordanK. Truth machine: The Contentious History of DNA Fingerprinting. London, University of Chicago Press, 2008: 191, 192
