There are several myths about the impact of decentralization of health care governance. These include a worsening of regional inequalities, greater privatization of health care, greater inefficiency resulting from duplication of managerial activities such as human resource policies, and lower productivity. These myths have partly arisen from a lack of rigorous assessments of the effects of decentralization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BevanG. Impact of devolution of health care in the UK: provider challenge in England and provider capture in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland?J Health Serv Res Policy2010; 15: 1–2
2.
BantingK, BroadwayR. “Defining the Sharing Community: The Federal Role in Health Care,” in Lazar Harvey, St-Hilaire France, eds. Money, Politics and Health Care: Reconstructing the Federal-Provincial Relationship.Montreal: Institute for Research on Public Policy, 2004
3.
KeatingM. Social Citizenship, Solidarity and Welfare in Regionalized and Plurinational States.Citizenship Studies2009; 13: 501–13
4.
GreerSL, ed. Territory, Democracy, and Justice: Federalism and Regionalism in Western Democracies.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006
5.
Costa-FontJ. Does devolution lead to regional inequalities in welfare activity?Environment and Planning c: Government and Policy2010; 28: 435–49
6.
Costa-FontJ, Salvador-CarullaL, CabasesJ, AlonsoJ, McDaidD. Tackling neglect and mental health reform in a devolved system of welfare governance.Journal of Social Policy2011; 40: 295–312
7.
Costa-FontJ, RicoA. Vertical competition in the Spanish National Health System (NHS).Public Choice2006; 128: 477–98
8.
BesleyT. Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government.Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006
