The rationales used in chiropractic are largely in keeping with current evidence-based guidance. When listening to debates for and against the scientific basis of chiropractic, it is important to be aware of the selective use of evidence on both sides and of the limitations of logical positivistic arguments when it comes to health care areas that have a substantial psychosocial component.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DagenaisS, CaroJ, HaldemanS. A systematic review of low back pain cost of illness studies in the United States and internationally. Spine J2008; 8: 8–20
2.
BorghoutsJAJ, KoesBW, VondelingH, BouterLM. Cost-of-illness of neck pain in The Netherlands in 1996. Pain1999; 80: 629–36
3.
ManiadakisN, GrayA. The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain2000; 84: 95–103
4.
WaddellG. The Back Pain Revolution.Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1998
5.
CSAG.Back Pain.London: Department of Health, 1994
6.
FosterNE, PincusT, UnderwoodMR, VogelS, BreenA, HardingG. Editorial: Understanding the process of care for musculoskeletal conditions - why a biomedical approach is inadequate. Rheumatology2003; 42: 401–3
7.
van TulderM, BeckerA, BekkeringT; COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain in Primary Care. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J2006; 15 (Suppl. 2):S169–S222
8.
Department of Health.The Musculoskeletal Services Framework.London: Department of Health, 2006
9.
BreenAC. Chiropractors and the treatment of back pain. Rheumatol Rehabil1977; 16: 46–53
10.
BurtonAK. Back pain in osteopathic practice. Rheumatol Rehabil1981; 20: 239–46
11.
PedersenP. A survey of chiropractic practice in Europe. Eur J Chiropract1994; 42: S3–S28
12.
AHCPR.Clinical practice guidelines no.14 - acute low back pain problems in adults.Washington DC: Agency for Health Care Policy Research, US Department of Health and Human Services, 1994
13.
Government, Science and Technology - Sixth Report.London: House of Lords - Science and Technology Committee, 1999
14.
MeekerWC, HaldemanS. Chiropractic: A profession at the crossroads of mainstream and alternative medicine. Ann Intern Med2002; 36: 216–27
15.
RubinsteinS, KnolDL, Leboeuf-YdeC, van TulderMW. Benign adverse events following chiropractic care for neck pain are associated with worse short-term outcomes but not worse outcomes at three months. Spine2008; 33: E950–E956
16.
DziewasR, KonradC, DragerBCervical artery dissection - clinical features, risk factors, therapy and outcome in 126 patients. J Neurol2003; 250: 1179–84
17.
CassidyJD, BoyleE, CoteP. Risk of vertebrobasilar stroke and chiropractic care: results of a population-based case-control and case-crossover study. Spine2008; 33(Suppl. 4): S176–S183
18.
ErnstE. Can chiropractic maim and kill?The Times2001 July 10
19.
ErnstE. Adverse effects of spinal manipulation: a systematic review. J R Soc Med2007; 100: 330–8
20.
ErnstE, AssendelftWJJ. Chiropractic for low back pain: we don't know whether it does more good than harm. Letter to the Editor. BMJ1998; 317: 160
21.
LaugharneR, LaugharneJ. Psychiatry, postmodernism and postnormal science. J R Soc Med2002; 95: 207–10
