Recent sexual health promotion strategies have veered between a negative emphasis on the deleterious consequences of sexually transmitted infections, and a more positive, eroticized approach to safer sex. The differences in approach are starkly reflected in the images chosen to illustrate them. We note that there are problems with both approaches. The main purpose of this review is to demonstrate how this dichotomy was transcended by the sixteenth century Florentine Mannerist painter, Agnolo Bronzino, in his allegory on syphilis.
DavidsonR. Dangerous Liaisons: A Social History of Venereal Diseases in Scotland. London: Rodolphi, 2000
2.
ThompsonE. A Social History of Marketing: Perspectives on UK Sexual Health Promotion. EMAC Conference Presentation, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, 2001. Available at: http://mora.rente.nhh.no/conferences/emac2001/Sessions/5.1.pdf (last accessed 17 February 2009)
3.
Department of Health and Social Security. AIDS: Don't Die of Ignorance. London: HMSO, 1987
4.
JoffeH. Social representations of AIDS: towards encompassing issues of power. Pap Soc Representation/Textes Sur les Représentations Sociales1995;4:1–40
5.
LeeH. Why sexual health promotion misses its audience: men who have sex with men reading the texts. J Health Organis Manag2007;21:205–19
6.
CrosbyA. The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Co, 1972
7.
BakerB, ArmelagosG. The origin and antiquity of syphilis: paleopathological diagnoses and interpretation. Curr Anthropol1998;29:703–37
8.
HealyM. Bronzino's London ‘Allegory’ and the art of syphilis. Oxf Art J1997;20:3–11
9.
ConwayJ. Syphilis and Bronzino's London allegory. J Warburg Courtauld Inst1986;49:250–55
10.
GoffenR. Renaissance Rivals: Michelangelo, Leonardo, Raphael, Titian. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004
11.
Ovid. Metamorphoses, Trans.MelvilleA. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986
