We report a case of intrauterine device (IUD) removal five years after its insertion which was broken during the removal procedure. One of the arms of the IUD remained inside the uterus. We allowed three months for spontaneous expulsion. When this did not happen, we proceeded with a hysteroscopic removal. Because of its embebbed position in the myometrium this could not be removed during hysteroscopy and finally it was left in situ. The patient was monitored every three months for a period of 12 months. There was no problem. We report this case because doctors may find it necessary to remove the IUD in certain situations and be aware of such a breakage and various precautions to prevent this.
BaileyP.Teenage pregnancies: is the high rate of teenage pregnancy and parenthood in the UK a public health problem?J Fam Plann Reprod Healthc2005; 31: 315–9
2.
NICE Clinical Guideline 30, London, Issue date: October 2005
3.
MavranezouliI, WilkinsonC.LARC: not only effective but also a cost effective option for NHS.J Fam Plann Reprod Healthc2006; 32: 3–4
4.
LeeDJ.Training to fit IUD and IUS for general practitioners: is there an alternative method for service delivery.J Fam Plann Reprod Healthc2007; 33: 205–7
BonachoI, PitaS, Gomez-BesteiroMI.The importance of removal of IUD in genital colonization by actinomyces.Gynaecol Obstet Invest2001; 52: 119–23
9.
KosonenA, ThieryM.Corrosion of filamentous intrauterine copper. The MLCU250 and the MLCu 375.Contraception1983; 27: 85–93
10.
KosonenA.Factors influencing the dissolution of copper in utero.Contracept Deliv Syst1981; 2: 77–85
11.
GoldstuckND, HofmeyrGJ, SonnendeckerEW, BuchartA.In vitro study of fracture forces associated with the Copper 7, Nova T and MLCu 250/375 intrauterine devices.Contraception1990; 41: 583–9
12.
EdelmanDA, van OsWA.Duration of use of copper releasing IUDs and the incidence of copper wire breakage.Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol1990; 34: 267–72
13.
Multiload Cu375 Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC)Organon Laboratories Ltd, Cambridge Cambs, UK
