… The uncomfortable interface between medicine,science and the law…

Dyer C . Appeal court judges say scientific controversies must be settled by ‘methods of science' not law. BMJ 2010; 340: 777

Tuerckheimer D . Criminal Justice at a Crossroads: Science-Dependent Prosecution and the Problem of Epistemic Contingency. Alabama Law Review 2010; 62:(forthcoming 2011)

Richards PG , Bertocci GE , Bonshek RE , Shaken baby syndrome. Arch Dis Child 2006; 91: 205–6

Mackey M . After the Court of Appeal: R v Harris and others [2005] EWCA crim 1980. Arch Dis Child 2006; 91: 873–4

Duhaime AC , Ennarelli TA , Sutton LE , Schutt L . The “Shaken Baby Syndrome”: a misnomer? J Paediatric Neurosciences 1988; 4: 77–86

Christian CW , Block R . Abusive head trauma in infants and children. Pediatrics 2009; 123: 1409–11

Adamsbaum C , Grabar S , Mejean N , Rey-Salmon C . Abusive head trauma: judicial admissions highlight violent and repetitive shaking. Pediatrics 2010; 126: 546–55

Matshes E . Retinal and Optic Nerve Sheath Haemorrhages are not Pathognomonic of Abusive Head Injury. Abstract: Presentation to Annual Conference of American Academy of Forensic Science, February 2010

Donohoe M . Evidence-based medicine and shaken baby syndrome: part I: literature review, 1966–1998. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2003; 24: 239–42

Geddes JF , Tasker RC , Hackshaw AK , Dural haemorrhage in non-traumatic infant deaths: does it explain the bleeding in ‘shaken baby syndrome'? Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2003; 29: 14–22

Welsh C , Marshall D . A National Co-ordinated Approach to Cases of Non-Accidental Head Injury in the UK. Atlanta, GA: Eleventh International Conference on Shaken Baby Syndrome/Abusive Head Trauma, 2010