Doctors, particularly in aesthetic surgery, are increasingly under public and press scrutiny. This paper sets out how, and why, the press can influence the outcome of a professional investigation or the expression of anger by a disgruntled patient. Seven steps are set out which clinicians can follow to minimize the risk to their reputation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Reuters speech on public life; Tony Blair; 12 June2007. See http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/6744581.stm
2.
NigelHawkes, Health Editor, The Times. See http://www.mediawise.org.uk/files/uploaded/Quality%20and%20Independence%20of%20British%20Journalism.pdf
3.
LewisJ, WilliamsA, FranklinB, ThomasJ, MosdellN. The Quality and Independence of British Journalism. Cardiff: Cardiff University Media Department, 2008. See http://www.mediawise.org.uk/files/uploaded/Quality%20and%20Independence%20of%20British%20Journ alism.pdf
4.
JustinLewisProfessor, Cardiff University Media Department; February 2008. See http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/jomec/newsandevents/news/08fourthrate.html
5.
Lord Dacre's speech to the Society of Editors Conference; 9 November 2008. See http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&storycode=42394
6.
7.
8.
KevinMarsh, BBC College of Journalism, February 2008. See http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2008/02/journalism_not.churnalism.html
9.
General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. London: GMC, 2006. See http://www.gmc-uk.org/guidance/good_medical_practice/probity/honest_trustworthy.asp
10.
11.
RosenbergH, FeldmanCS. No Time To Think. New York, NY: Continuum Publishing, 2008
