During a Parliamentary debate on the NHS Redress Act, questions were raised about the supposed better success rates of specialist lawyers versus non-specialists in clinical negligence cases. As a result we decided to look at the statistical evidence, based on the case files of a large medico-legal practice of a consultant general surgeon.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
HansardHC, vol 451, col 591 (6 Nov 2006)
2.
BlackD. Preparation of medical evidence on liability. In: PowersM, HarrisN, BartonA eds. Clinical Negligence. 4th edn.Haywards Heath: Tottel Publishing, 2008: 273–338
3.
4.
SRA Clinical Negligence Panel Criteria and Guidance Notes. See www.sra.org.uk and www.accreditation.sra.org.uk
5.
AvMA Clinical Negligence Panel Booklet (Sept 2006). See www.avma.org.uk
6.
BodyD, GillottC. The conduct of proceedings. In: PowersM, HarrisN, eds. Clinical Negligence. 3rd edn.London: Butterworths, 2000: 407–547
HallG. Legal aid in clinical negligence. Medical Litigation 2002; Nov; 12–14. See www.medneg.com
9.
StuttC. Legal Services Commission's response to ‘Legal aid in clinical negligence’. Med Lit2002; Nov; 15
10.
Comptroller and Auditor General. Handling clinical negligence claims in England. HC 403 Session 2000–2001 (3 May 2001): 32. See www.nao.org.uk
11.
Comptroller and Auditor General. Community Legal Service: the introduction of contracting. HC 89 Session 2002-2003 (28 Nov 2002): 18. See www.nao.org.uk
12.
HallG. Legal aid success rates in clinical negligence. Med Lit2002; Dec; 9–10
13.
HallG. Legal aid in clinical negligence: success rates revisited – again. Med Lit2003; Mar; 13–14
RobinsJ. Clinical judgment: is slashing by almost 95% the number of firms conducting legally-aided medical negligence work a good idea?Law Society Gazette1998; 18 Nov
16.
HansardHL, vol 586, cols 1203 and 1204 (4 Mar 1998)
17.
ColeB. Trends in the Solicitors' Profession: Annual Statistical Report 1999. London: The Law Society, 2000
