Abstract
After a robotic surgical misadventure in the United States, the subsequent litigation often involves a medical malpractice action against the surgeon and the hospital, and a products liability action against the robotic surgical instrument manufacturer. Because of the multiple Defendants, finger-pointing is common and results in a settlement. However, metadata within the robotic instrument may provide the manufacturer with a strong defence against liability. Accordingly, metadata within the computer may result in hospitals and surgeons shouldering more of the liability for robotic surgical misadventures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
