Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In order for children to receive the best possible medical treatment, it is essential that research is conducted to discover safe and effective interventions and dosages. This article focuses on the legal and ethical implications of recruiting into health-care research minors who are not competent to consent. It considers the role played by best interests in obtaining valid parental consent for the participation of children in research, both at common law and under the Regulations that govern clinical trials of medicinal products. In doing so it questions the legality of parental consent to children's involvement in research, and identifies some inconsistencies in parental understandings of best interests in relation to medical research and treatment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Biggs

. Competent minors and health-care research: autonomy does not rule, okay? Clin Ethics 2009;4:176–80

Edwards

, McNamee

. Ethical concerns regarding guidelines for the conduct of research on children. J Med Ethics 2005;31:351–4 at 351

Conroy

, McIntyre

, Choonara

, Unlicensed and off label drug use in neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1999;80:142–5

Conroy

, Choonara

, Impicciatore

, Survey of unlicensed and off-label drug use in paediatric wards in European countries. BMJ 2000;320:79–82

Federal Drug Administration. 2009. Drug Research and Children. See http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm143565.htm (last checked 20 July 2010)

Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health: Ethics Advisory Committee. Guidelines for the ethical conduct of medical research involving children. Arch Dis Child 2000;82:177–82

General Medical Council. Good Practice in Research and Consent to Research. London: GMC, 2010

General Medical Council. 0–18 years: Guidance for All Doctors. London: GMC, 2007: Para 36

Chappuy

, Doz

, Blanche

, Parental consent in paediatric clinical research. Arch Dis Child 2006;91:112–6

10.

Nicholson

. Medical Research with Children: Ethics, Law and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986:138

11.

Kodish

. Ethics and Research with Children: A Care Based Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005:12

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

Giesen

. Civil liability of physicians for new methods of treatment and experimentation. Med Law Rev 1995;3:22

17.

For further detail see Spriggs

. Canaries in the mines: children, risk, non-therapeutic research, and justice. J Med Ethics 2004;30:176–81

18.

19.

Mason

, Laurie

. Mason and McCall-Smith's Law and Medical Ethics. 8th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011:643

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

26.

27.

28.

For some specific examples see Biggs

. Healthcare Research Ethics and Law: Regulation, Review and Responsibility. London: Routledge-Cavendish 2010:19–34

29.

30.

Mukattash

, Millership

, Collier

, McElnay

. Public awareness and views on unlicensed use of medicines in children. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2008;66:838–45

31.

Lenk

, Koch

, Zappel

, Wiesemann

. Off-label, off-limits? Parental awareness and attitudes towards off-label use in paediatrics. Eur J Pediatr 2009;168:1473–8

32.

33.

Elliston

. The Best Interests of the Child in Healthcare. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2007:241

Children and health-care research: best treatment,best interests and best practice

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References