The Doctrine of Double Effect and end-of-life decisions

Van der Heide A , Deliens L , Faisst K , End of-life decision-making in six European countries: descriptive study. Lancet 2003;362:345–50

Slowther A. Medical futility and ‘Do Not Attempt Resuscitation’ orders. Clin Ethics 2006;1:18–20

Aquinas T. Of killing. In: Baummgarth WP , Regan RJ , eds. On Law Morality and Politics. IN, USA: Hackett Publishing Co.; 1998:226–7

Managan J. An historical analysis of the principle of double effect. Theol Stud 1949;10:41–61

Saini P. The doctrine of double effect and the law of murder. Medico-legal J 1999;67:106–20

Billings JA , Block SD. Slow euthanasia. J Palliat Care 1996;6:21–30

Smith WJ. Forced Exit: The Slippery Slope from Assisted Suicide To Legalized Murder. New York, NY: Random House, 1997

Draper H , Slowther A. Euthanasia. Clin Ethics 2008;3:113–15

Donegan A. Moral absolutism and the double effect exception: reflections on Joseph Boyle's ‘Who is entitled to double effect?’ J Med Phil 1991;16:511–14

Bennett J. Foreseen Side Effects versus Intended Consequences. The Act Itself. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1995:194–225

Castaneda HN. Intentionality and identity in human action and philosophical method. Nous 1979;13:255

Davis N. The doctrine of double effect: problems of interpretation. Pacific Phil Quart 1984;65:107–23

McIntyre A. Doing away with double effect. Ethics 2001;111: 219–55

Doyal L. The moral character of the clinicians or the best interests of the patients? Br Med J 1999;318:1432–3

Corner J. More openness needed in palliative care. BMJ 1997; 317:1242

House of Lords Select Committee. Report of the Select Committee on Medical Ethics. HL. Paper 21. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1994

General Medical Council. Withholding and Withdrawing Life-Prolonging Treatments: Good Practice in Decision Making. London: GMC, 2006

George R. Lethal opioids or dangerous prescribers? Palliat Med 2007;21: 77–80

Woodward PA. The Doctrine of Double Effect: Philosophers Debate a Controversial Moral Principle. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2001

The Shipman Inquiry–First Report. Chapter 9. See http://www.the-shipman-inquiry.org.uk/fr_page.asp?id=137 (last checked 16 January 2009)