QuillTE. Death and Dignity: Making Choices and Taking Charge. New York, NY: WW Norton, 1993:50
17.
Pretty v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 1, [65] (Eur Ct HR)
18.
19.
20.
21.
See generallyNicolN, WylieH. Between the Dying and the Dead: Dr Jack Kevorkian, the Assisted Suicide Machine and the Battle to Legalise Euthanasia. London: Vision, 2006
22.
RoscoeLA, MalphursJE, DragovicLJ, CohenD. Dr Jack Kevorkian and cases of euthanasia in Oakland County, Michigan, 1990–1998. N Engl J Med2000;343:1735–6
23.
JohnsonD. Kevorkian sentenced to 10 to 25 years in prison. New York Times 14 April 1999:A1
24.
25.
QuillTE. Death and dignity: a case of individualized decision making. N Engl J Med1991;324:691–4
26.
See also QuillTE. Doctor, I want to die. Will you help me?JAMA1993;270:870–3
27.
Quill, above, n. 25
28.
29.
30.
Cox (1992) 12 BMLR 38 (Winchester Crown Ct)
31.
ArlidgeA. The trial of Dr David Moor. Criminal Law Review2000:31
32.
33.
Morrison (1998) 174 NSR (2d) 201 (NSSC)
34.
35.
36.
CernetigM. Police suspect Rodriguez suicide. Globe and Mail 14 February 1994:A1
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
Pretty v UK (2002) 35 EHRR 1 (Eur Ct HR). The constitutionality of the English prohibition on assisting a suicide had been previously considered by the European Commission on Human Rights in R v UK (1983) 6 EHRR 140 (affirming a conviction of conspiring to aid and abet suicide where the defendant had facilitated contact between individuals desiring assistance in suicide and an individual willing to provide such assistance). The European Commission upheld the prohibition as necessary in a democratic society to prevent abuses and protect health
43.
44.
Vacco v Quill (1997) 521 US 793, 799 (USSC)
45.
Washington v Glucksberg (1997) 521 US 702, 735 (USSC)
46.
47.
48.
Krischer v McIver (1997) 697 So 2d 97, 100 (Fla SC) (following the US Supreme Court holding that there is no fundamental right to assisted suicide and holding state statute criminalizing assisted suicide constitutional)
49.
Kevorkian (1994) 527 NW2d 714 (Mich SC) (holding that the state statute banning assisted suicide conformed with both the state and federal constitutions)
50.
Compassion in Dying v Washington (1996) 79 F3d 790, 839 (9th Cir en banc)
51.
Quill v Vacco (1996) 80 F3d 716, 729 (2nd Cir)
52.
53.
AdamsM, NysH. Euthanasia in the low countries: comparative reflections on the Belgian and Dutch Euthanasia Act. In: SchotsmansP, MeulenbergsT, eds. Euthanasia and Palliative Care in the Low Countries. Leuven: Peeters, 2005:5–33
54.
WeyersH. Euthanasia: The process of legal change in the Netherlands. In: KlijnA, OtlowskiM, TrappenburgM, eds. Regulating Physician-negotiated Death. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001:11–27
55.
GriffithsJ. Self-regulation by the Dutch medical profession of medical behavior that potentially shortens life. In: KrabbendamH, ten NapelH-M, eds. Regulating Morality: A Comparison of The Role of the State in Mastering the Mores in the Netherlands and the United States. Antwerpen: Maklu, 2000:173–90
56.
De HaanJ. The new Dutch Law on Euthanasia. Med Law Rev2002;10:57–75
57.
Comité Consultatif National d'Éthique (France). Fin de vie, arrêt de vie, euthanasie [End of life, ending life, euthanasia]. no. 63, 27 January 2000. See www.ccne-ethique.fr/docs/en/avis063.pdf (last checked 13 March 2008)
58.
See above, n. 2
59.
60.
Washington v Glucksberg (1997) 521 US 702, 734–5, 785–6 (USSC)
61.
Vacco v Quill (1997) 521 US 793, 809 (USSC)
62.
GriffithsJ, WeyersH, AdamsM. Euthanasia and the Law in Europe. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2008