Repeat volumetric analysis of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) after endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) is time-consuming and requires advanced processing, dedicated equipment, and skilled operators.
Purpose
To clarify the validity of measuring the maximal short-axis diameter (Dmax) of AAA in follow-up non-enhanced axial CT as a means of detecting substantial endoleaks after EVAR.
Material and Methods
CT images were retrospectively reviewed in 47 patients (7 women, 40 men; mean age, 76.2 years) who had no endoleak on initial contrast-enhanced CT after EVAR. Regular follow-up CT studies were performed every 6 months. At each CT study, the Dmax on the CT axial image was measured and compared with that on the last CT (115 data-sets). Contrast-enhanced CT was regarded as the standard of reference to decide the presence or absence of endoleaks. The appearance of endoleak was defined as the end point of this study.
Results
Endoleaks were detected in 17 patients during the follow-up period. Mean Dmax changes for 6 months were significant between positive and negative endoleak cases (1.8 ± 1.9 vs. −1.1 ± 3.0 mm, P < 0.0001). When the Dmax change ≤ 0 mm for 6 months was used as the threshold for negative endoleak, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 74.5, 82.4, 96.1, and 35.9%, respectively. When Dmax change ≤−1 mm was used as the threshold, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 38.8, 100, 100, and 22.1%, respectively.
Conclusion
Contrast-enhanced CT is not required for the evaluation of endoleaks when the Dmax decreases by at least 1 mm over 6 months after EVAR.
BrewsterDC, JonesJE, ChungTK, Long-term outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the first decade. Ann Surg2006;244:426–38
3.
LeeJT, AzizIN, LeeJT, Volume regression of abdominal aortic aneurysms and its relation to successful endoluminal exclusion. J Vasc Surg2003;38:1254–63
4.
AbadaHT, GolzarianJ. Multidetector CT in abdominal aortic aneurysm following endovascular repair: how to consider the value of a delayed phase. Radiology2007;245:610
5.
BargelliniI, CioniR, PetruzziP, Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: analysis of aneurysm volumetric changes at mid-term follow-up. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol2005;28:426–33
6.
CzermakBV, FraedrichG, SchockeMF, Serial CT volume measurements after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther2001;8:380–9
7.
PrinssenM, VerhoevenEL, VerhagenHJ, Decision making in follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair based on diameter and volume measurements: A blinded comparison. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2003;26:184–7
8.
BaumuellerS, NguyenTD, GoettiRP, Maximum diameter measurements of aortic aneurysms on axial CT images after endovascular aneurysm repair: sufficient for follow-up?Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol2011;34:1182–9
WhiteGH, MayJ, WaughRC, Type III and type IV endoleak: toward a complete definition of blood flow in the sac after endoluminal AAA repair. J Endovasc Surg1998;5:305–9
11.
ParodiJC, PalmazJC, BaroneHD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg1991;5:491–9
12.
WalschotLH, LaheijRJ, VerbeekAL. Outcome after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: A meta-analysis. J Endovasc Ther2002;9:82–9
13.
ZarinsCK, WhiteRA, MollFL, The AneuRx stent graft: Four-year results and worldwide experience 2000. J Vasc Surg2001;33:S135–45
14.
MarinML, HollierLH, EllozySH, Endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal and thoracic aortic aneurysms: A ten-year experience with 817 patients. Ann Surg2003;238:586–93
15.
ElkouriS, GloviczkiP, McKusickMA, Perioperative complications and early outcome after endovascular and open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg2004;39:497–505
16.
LeeWA, CarterJW, UpchurchG, Perioperative outcomes after open and endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States during 2001. J Vasc Surg2004;39:491–6
17.
FransenGA, VallabhaneniSRSr, van MarrewijkCJ, Rupture of infta-renal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair: A series from EUROSTAR registry. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2003;26:487–93
18.
VeithFJ, BaumRA, OhkiT, Nature and significance of endoleaks and endotension: Summary of opinions expressed at an international conference. J Vasc Surg2002;35:1029–35
19.
SampramES, KarafaMT, MaschaEJ, Nature, frequency, and predictors of secondary procedures after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg2003;37:930–7
20.
PrinssenM, WixonCL, BuskensE, Surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: Diagnostics, complications, and associated costs. Ann Vasc Surg2004;18:421–7
KrishnamMS, TomasianA, DeshpandeV, Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol2008;43:411–20
25.
FrançoisCJ, TuiteD, DeshpandeV, Unenhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta: initial clinical evaluation. Am J Roentgenol2008;190:902–6
26.
MirzaTA, KarthikesalingamA, JacksonD, Duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of endoleak after EVAR: systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg2010;39:418–28
27.
BalmR, KaateeR, BlankensteijnJD, CT-angiography of abdominal aortic aneurysms after transfemoral endovascular management. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg1996;12:182–8
28.
ArmonMP, YusufSW, WhitakerSC, Thrombus distribution and changes in aneurysm size following endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg1998;16:472–6
29.
Singh-RangerR, McArthurT, CorteMD, The abdominal aortic aneurysm sac after endoluminal exclusion: A medium-term morphologic follow-up based on volumetric technology. J Vasc Surg2000;31: 490–500
30.
HongC, HeikenJP, SicardGA, Clinical significance of endoleak detected on follow-up CT after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Am J Roentgenol2008;191:808–13
31.
HansenCJ, KimB, AzizI, Late-onset type II endoleaks and the incidence of secondary intervention. Ann Vasc Surg2004;18:26–31
32.
van MarrewijkC, ButhJ, HarrisPL, Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: The EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg2002;35:461–73
33.
JonesJE, AtkinsMD, BrewsterDC, Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes. J Vasc Surg2007;46:1–8
34.
JonkerFH, ArunyJ, MuhsBE, Management of type II endoleaks: preoperative versus postoperative versus expectant management. Semin Vasc Surg2009;22:165–71
35.
BrewsterDC, CronenwettJL, HallettJWJr, Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg2003;37:1106–17
36.
SonessonB, DiasN, MalinaM, Intra-aneurysm pressure measurements in successfully excluded abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg2003;37:733–8
37.
DiasNV, IvancevK, MalinaM, Intra-aneurysm sac pressure measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair: differences between shrinking, unchanged, and expanding aneurysms with and without endoleaks. J Vasc Surg2004;39:1229–35
