Abstract
We evaluated the accuracy of realtime echocardiography studies conducted via telemedicine (at 384 kbit/s) and prerecorded video studies, by comparing the results with subsequent in-person echocardiography examination performed at follow-up. Between January 2002 and December 2004, there were 769 paediatric echo studies of patients aged one day to 19 years by telemedicine. There were three cases (0.4%) in which the study could not be successfully transmitted in realtime due to ISDN line or equipment failure. These were recorded, then transmitted and reviewed within 24 h. A normal heart was demonstrated in 272 studies (35%). A non-urgent congenital heart defect (CHD) was detected in 311 studies (41%). A critical cardiac abnormality was identified in 25 studies (3% of the total). Sixty-seven studies were repeated in person at the tertiary centre. All but one of the follow-up echocardiograms confirmed our initial telemedicine diagnosis (99% sensitivity). There were 655 videorecorded studies delivered to the tertiary centre between February 2002 and November 2003. Thirty-two patients had a repeated echocardiogram performed there. There were either discrepancies or lack of diagnostic clarity in 12 studies (38%) compared with on-site echo evaluations. This suggests that echocardiography evaluation using videorecordings may be less accurate than via realtime telemedicine.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.