Health delivery system changes required when integrating telemedicine into existing treatment flows of information and patients

Abstract

Business model and financial recovery issues dominate discussions about using telemedicine to improve chronic disease management. The technical issues are numerous, daunting and complex, but many can be addressed using the resources and infrastructure available in large, well-integrated clinical information systems. The cost-benefit balance will change when it becomes possible to use devices that are owned by patients for everyday use, rather than installing special-purpose devices for telemedicine. Technology and communications capabilities are driven mainly by market factors other than uses for health care. Provider-side telemedicine capabilities, specifically for upload, storage and display of home medical data, will improve as technology develops. How health-care providers will process the larger amount of data made available by telemedicine is a clinical issue, but it is likely that software will emerge to assist in this task. The alignment of financial incentives for health-care providers is a decisive factor in understanding why telemedicine has had substantial deployment within the US Veterans Hospital Administration system, and to some extent within prison health systems and the Kaiser Permanente Health Plan, but much less widely in other settings.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Grigsby

What kinds of evaluation studies can be done to accelerate the evidence base for telemedicine? White paper. AHRQ-CMS-OHSU Telemedicine Workshop, 30-31 March, 2005

Darkins

AW.

VHA care coordination/telehealth: 30 practical realities for virtual services. Office of Care Coordination VHA Telehealth Newsletter 2004; IV: 2–5. See http://www.va.gov/occ/Docs/newsletter_spring_04v4il.pdf (last checked 24 February 2006)

Office of Technology Policy. US Department of Commerce. Innovation, Demand and Investment in Telehealth. February, 2004. See http://www.technology.gov/reports/TechPolicy/Telehealth/2004Report.pdf (last checked 24 February 2006)

Larsen

, Stamm

, Davis

, Magaletta

PR.

Prison telemedicine and telehealth utilization in the United States: state and federal perceptions of benefits and barriers. Telemed J E Health 2004; 10(suppl. 2): 81–9.

Grigsby

, Sanders

JH.

Telemedicine: where it is and where it's going. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129: 123–7

Field

, ed. Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996; 83–15

Blum

JD.

Internet medicine and the evolving legal status of the physician-patient relationship. J Legal Med 2003; 24: 413–55

Alverson

, Shannon

, Sullivan

Telehealth in the trenches: reporting back from the frontlines in rural America. Telemed J E Health 2004; 10(suppl. 2): 95–109.

Casalino

LP.

Disease management and the organization of physician practice. JAMA 2005; 293: 485–8

10.

Bodenheimer

, Wagner

, Grumbach

Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. JAMA 2002; 288: 1909–14

11.

Bodenheimer

, Wagner

, Grumbach

Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA 2002; 288: 1775–9

12.

Parrino

Information technology and primary care at the VA: making a good thing better. 2003: 1–2. See http://www.hsrd.research.va.gov/publications/internal/foruml0_03.pdf (last checked 24 February 2006)

13.

Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans Hospital Administration. VHA Notice 99-04. 3 October, 1999. Telemedicine Strategic Planning Document

14.

McWilliams

The top 10 trends in 10 industries. Consumer electronics. It all connects - it all converges. Wall Street J 2005; R3

15.

Dick

, Steen

, eds. The Computer-based Patient Record: Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1991

16.

Fletcher

, Dayhoff

, Wu

, Graves

, Jones

RE.

Computerized medical records in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Cancer 2001; 91(suppl. 8): 1603–6.

17.

Department of Veterans Affairs. VHA Handbook 1907.1. Health Information Management and Health Records 15 April 2004. See http://wwwl.va.gov/VHAPUBLICATIONS/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=434 (last checked 27 February 2006)

18.

Department of Veterans Affairs. The credentialing and privileging of VHA health care providers remotely delivering health care to patients at home, in Vet centers, and in non-health care settings via telemedicine and/or telehealth. VHA Directive 2002-042. 9 July 2002. See http://wwwl.va.gov/vhapublications/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=189 (last checked 27 February 2006)

19.

Department of Veterans Affairs. VHA Vision 2020: Charting A New Direction. Washington, DC: Veterans Health Administration, Office of Policy and Planning, 2003

20.

Hatzakis

Jr , Haselkorn

, Williams

, Turner

, Nichol

Telemedicine and the delivery of health services to veterans with multiple sclerosis. J Rehabil Res Dev 2003; 40: 265–82

21.

Kaiser Permanente Aims for E-Health within Three Years. See http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/item.cfm?ID=360 (last checked 27 February 2006)

22.

Darkins

AW.

Telemedicine and Telehealth in the Veterans Health Administration American Telmedicine Association Newsroom. See http://www.atmeda.org/news/vhaarticle.htm (last checked 27 February 2006)

23.

Shea

, Starren

, Weinstock

Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) Project: rationale and design. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9: 49–62

24.

Starren

, Hripcsak

, Sengupta

Columbia University's Informatics for Diabetes Education and Telemedicine (IDEATel) project: technical implementation. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2002; 9: 25–36

25.

Hripcsak

, Cimino

, Sengupta

Web CIS: large scale deployment of a web-based clinical information system. In: Lorenzi

, ed. Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Hanley & Belfus, Inc., 1999: 804–8

26.

Shea

, Weinstock

, Starren

for the IDEATel Consortium. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 40–51

27.

Casalino

, Gillies

, Shortell

External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases. JAMA 2003; 289: 434–41