Is it time for the virtual chaperone in genitourinary medicine clinics?

Abstract

The General Medical Council recommends that chaperones must be offered during intimate examinations. Implementation of these guidelines may serve to protect both patients and staff within the genitourinary (GU) medicine clinic, but is likely to have major ramifications from a practical, financial and staffing perspective. The Virtual Chaperone (VC) is an objective device making audio and visual recordings of patients' consultations and examinations. Information cannot be manipulated and is encrypted for security. It would not replace the human chaperone. This study investigated the attitudes of GU medicine staff and patients to the VC in an inner city sexual health clinic. Voluntary, anonymized questionnaires were distributed to all members of the multidisciplinary team and 200 patients. The patient response rate was 90% (n = 180). Only 40% of respondents felt the VC was acceptable in GU medicine clinics. Two-thirds felt unsure or were against the VC recording during consultations, and fewer wished the examination to be recorded. Most opted to switch off the video entirely. Almost 50% of respondents felt that the VC was designed to protect staff, whereas only 41% thought it would protect patients. The staff response rate was 69% (n = 35). Almost three-quarters of respondents were unsure or felt the device was unacceptable. Less than half would feel comfortable with the VC recording during consults. Overall, three-quarters of respondents were either unsure or did not support the introduction of the VC. There was a clear feeling (>80%) that the VC would protect staff and patients, 71% indicating that the trust would also benefit. Despite its success in other outpatient specialties, GU medicine staff and patients do not favour the introduction of the VC.