Abstract
An electronic database was used as an audit tool by a peripatetic auditor to collect data on the management of genital chlamydial infection from genitourinary medicine clinics. A paper proforma was used to obtain data on clinic facilities. The database generated pre-specified quantitative reports for comparison to national standards and guidelines, as well as comparison of performance between clinics and to a previous regional audit. Feedback and discussion took place to identify interventions intended to improve practice. This methodology allowed for rapid dissemination of the audit findings to clinics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
