JolliffeI.T., Principal Component Analysis.Springer-Verlag, New York (2002).
3.
HotellingH., “Multivariate quality control illustrated by air testing of sample bombsights”, in Sel. Tech. Stat. Anal. Sci. Ind. Res. Prod. Manag. Eng., Ed by EisenhartC.HastayM. W. and WallisW. A.McGraw-Hill, New York and London, pp. 111–184 (1947).
SjöströmM. and WoldS., “A method for analysing chemical data in terms of similarity and analogy”, in Chemom. Theory Appl., ACS Symposium Series 52, Ed by KowalskiB. R.American Chemical Society, Washington, p. 243 (1977).
De MaesschalckR.CandolfiA.MassartD.L. and HeuerdingS., “Decision criteria for soft independent modelling of class analogy applied to near infrared data”, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst.47, 65–77 (1999). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(98)00159-2
8.
RodionovaO.Y.BalyklovaK.S.TitovaA.V. and PomerantsevA.L., “Quantitative risk assessment in classification of drugs with identical API content”, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.98, 186–192 (2014). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2014.05.033
9.
PomerantsevA.L. and RodionovaO.Y., “Concept and role of extreme objects in PCA/SIMCA”, J. Chemometr.28, 429–438 (2014). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.2506
10.
PomerantsevA.L., “Acceptance areas for multivariate classification derived by projection methods”, J. Chemometr.22, 601–609 (2008). doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.1147
11.
HarringtonP. de B., “Fuzzy grid encoded independent modeling for class analogies (FIMCA)”, Anal. Chem.86, 4883–4892 (2014). doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac5001543