It is a long-standing convention of NIR news that we publish a modified version of the Tomas Hirschfeld Award lecture soon after the award has taken place. In 2016, the Hirschfeld Award was made to Jean-Michel Roger (IRSTEA, France) someone who is well-known within the near infrared community as a chemometrician of note and who has made very many contributions to the advancement in our understanding of data analysis and both quantitative and qualitative prediction techniques. It is our pleasure to reproduce below a summary of Jean-Michel's lecture delivered in Chambersburg at the IDRC event in August of this year.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MeyerC.D., Matrix Analysis and Applied Linear Algebra (Vol. 2). SIAM (2000).
2.
RogerJ.M.ChauchardF. and Bellon-MaurelV., “EPO–PLS external parameter orthogonalisation of PLS application to temperature-independent measurement of sugar content of intact fruits”, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst.66, 191–204 (2003). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(03)00051-0
3.
AndrewA. and FearnT., “Transfer by orthogonal projection: Making near-infrared calibrations robust to between-instrument variation”, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst.72, 51–56 (2004). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2004.02.004
4.
ZeaiterM.RogerJ.M. and Bellon-MaurelV., “Dynamic orthogonal projection. A new method to maintain the on-line robustness of multivariate calibrations. Application to NIR-based monitoring of wine fermentations”, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst.80, 227–235 (2006). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2005.06.011
5.
ZhuY.FearnT.SamuelD.DharA.HameedO.BownS.G. and LovatL.B., “Error removal by orthogonal subtraction (EROS): A customised pre-treatment for spectroscopic data”, J. Chemometr.22, 130–134 (2008). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cem.1117
6.
RogerJ.M.ChauchardF. and WilliamsP., “Removing the block effects in calibration by means of dynamic orthogonal projection. Application to the year effect correction for wheat protein prediction”, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc.16, 311–315 (2008). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.793
7.
RogerJ.M.PalagosB.BertrandD. and Fernandez-AhumadaE., “CovSel: Variable selection for highly multivariate and multi-response calibration: Application to IR spectroscopy”, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst.106, 216–223 (2011). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2010.10.003
BarkerM. and RayensW., “Partial least squares for discrimination”, J. Chemometr.17, 166–173 (2003). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cem.785
11.
ChenL.F.LiaoH.Y.M.KoM.T.LinJ.C. and YuG.J., “A new LDA-based face recognition system which can solve the small sample size problem”, Pattern Recogn.33, 1713–1726 (2000). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(99)00139-9
12.
HadouxX.RutledgeD.N.RabatelG. and RogerJ.M., “DROP-D: Dimension reduction by orthogonal projection for discrimination”, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst.146, 221–231 (2015). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.05.021
