Agave tequilana is a potential biofuel crop, for which the characters of
juice total soluble sugar content (TSS), dry matter content (DM), cellulose, hemicellulose
and lignin content are quality criteria. Spectra of leaves were obtained using a hand-held
silicon photodiode array (Si PDA)-based spectrometer with a wavelength range of 300–1100
nm and an InGaAs-based Fourier transform near infrared (FT-NIR) spectrometer with a
wavelength range of 1100–2500 nm. Fresh leaves were harvested at different maturity
stages, in different seasons and from two locations in Queensland during 2012–2014.
Partial least square regression models were developed for DM and TSS of fresh leaf, and
for cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin of dried material, with models tested on
populations of independent samples collected in different years, seasons and locations.
Prediction statistics for DM of fresh leaf using the Si PDA spectrometer (729–975 nm) were
r2 = 0.49–0.87 and root mean square error of prediction
(RMSEP) = 2.36–1.44%, while with the use of the FT-NIR spectrometer,
the prediction statistics were r2 = 0.53–0.66 and
RMSEP = 2.63–2.18% (across different years, seasons and locations).
Prediction statistics for TSS in fresh leaf using the Si PDA spectrometer (729–975 nm)
were r2 = 0.53–0.69 and RMSEP = 1.70–1.91%,
with poorer results obtained using the FT-NIR spectrometer (r2
= 0.33–0.56; RMSEP = 1.88–2.45%). With increased sample diversity in the
calibration set, NIR technology is recommended for estimation of DM and TSS in fresh
Agave leaves. FT-NIR-based prediction of cellulose, hemicellulose or
lignin of independent sets (of different years or cultivars) was unsatisfactory, with
r2 < 0.75 and bias >10% of mean. These results may be
improved with increased sample range, and attention to laboratory (reference method)
error. However, leaf cellulose and hemicellulose content may be more easily estimated
through correlation to leaf DM level (R2 of 0.77 across all
sampling events).
ChambersD.
and HoltumJ.M.,
Feasibility of Agave as a Feedstock for Biofuel Production in
Australia.Australian Government, Barton, ACT, p. 74
(2010).
2.
NorrisK.
and HartJ.,
“Direct spectrophotometric determination of moisture content of grain and
seeds”, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc.4, 23 (1996). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.940
KelleyS.S.RowellR.M.DavisM.JurichC.K. and
IbachR.,
“Rapid analysis of the chemical composition of agricultural fibers using
near infrared spectroscopy and pyrolysis molecular beam mass
spectrometry”, Biomass Bioenergy27, 77 (2004). doi: http://dx.doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.11.005
WalshK.GolicM. and
GreensillC.,
“Sorting of fruit using near infrared spectroscopy: Application to range
of fruit and vegetables for soluble solids and dry matter content”,
J. Near Infrared Spectrosc.12, 141 (2004). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1255/jnirs.419
7.
SubediP.P.WalshK.B. and
OwensG.,
“Prediction of mango eating quality at harvest using shortwave near
infrared spectrometry”, Postharvest Biol. Technol.43, 326 (2007). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.09.012
JonesP.SchimleckL.PeterG.DanielsR. and
ClarkA.,
“Nondestructive estimation of wood chemical composition of sections of
radial wood strips by diffuse reflectance near infrared spectroscopy”,
Wood Sci. Technol.40, 709 (2006). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00226-006-0085-6
10.
DownesG.M.HarwoodC.E.WiedemannJ.EbdonN.BondH. and
MederR.,
“Radial variation in kraft pulp yield and cellulose content in
Eucalyptus globulus wood across three contrasting sites predicted by
near infrared spectroscopy”, Can. J. For. Res.42, 1577 (2012). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x2012-083
BartonF.E.BargeronJ.D.GambleG.R.McAlisterD.L.
and HequetE.,
“Analysis of sticky cotton by near-infrared
spectroscopy”, Appl. Spectrosc.59, 1388 (2005). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1366/000370205774783214
13.
GreensillC.V.
and WalshK.B.,
“Optimization of instrumentation precision and wavelength resolution for
the performance of NIR calibrations of sucrose in a water–cellulose
matrix”, Appl. Spectrosc.54, 426 (2000). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1366/0003702001949528
14.
SluiterA.RuizC.ScarlataC. and
TempletonD.,
“Determination of extractives in biomass”, in
Laboratory Analytical Procedure (LAP).National Renewable Energy Laboratory,
Golden, CO (2008).
15.
SluiterA.HamesB.RuizR.ScarlataC.SluiterJ.TempletonD.
and CrockerD.,
“Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in
biomass”, in Laboratory Analytical Procedure.National Renewable Energy Laboratory,
Golden, CO (2008).
16.
GuthrieJ.A.WalshK.B.ReidD.J., and
LiebenbergC.J.,
“Assessment of internal quality attributes of mandarin fruit. 1. NIR
calibration model development”, Aust. J. Agric. Res.56, 405 (2005). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR04257
17.
HeW. and
HuH.,
“Prediction of hot-water soluble extractive, pentosan and cellulose
content of various wood species using FT-NIR spectroscopy”,
Bioresour. Technol.140, 299 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016//j.biortech.2013.04.115
18.
LiuL.YeX.P.WomacA.R. and
SokhansanjS.,
“Variability of biomass chemical composition and rapid analysis using
FT-NIR techniques”, Carbohydr. Polym.81, 820 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.03.058
19.
PokeF.S.
and RaymondC.A.,
“Predicting extractives, lignin, and cellulose contents using near
infrared spectroscopy on solid wood in Eucalyptus
globulus”, J. Wood Chem. Technol.26, 187 (2006). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02773810600732708