Heterogeneous substrates fed into agricultural biogas plants originate from many sources with resulting quality fluctuations potentially inhibiting the process. Biogas yield can be substantially increased by optimisation of the organic dry matter load. In this study, near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy was applied on-line in a re-circulating loop configuration operating identically as a full-scale setup. Ammonium could be modelled in the industrially-relevant range 2.42–8.52 gL−1 with an excellent accuracy and precision, slope ∼1.0, r2 = 0.97, corresponding to a relative root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of 6.7%. Also, dry matter in the similar plant relevant range 5.8–10.8 weight-percent could be predicted with acceptable accuracy (slope ∼1.0, r2 = 0.83, and a relative RMSEP below 8.0%. Based on these performance characteristics, it was concluded that NIR spectroscopy can be applied for optimising the efficiency of current and future biogas plants, as well as in biorefinery operations converting heterogeneous bioslurry, energy crops, and wastes into value-added products.
BakeevK.A., Process Analytical Technology, Second Edn.John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK (2010). doi: 10.1002/9780470689592
2.
Holm-NielsenJ.B.SeadiAl T. and Oleskowicz-PopielP., “The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization”, J. Bioresour. Technol.100, 5478 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046
3.
NielsenH.B. and AngelidakiI., “Codigestion of manure and organic waste at centralized biogas plants: Process imbalances and limitations”, J. Wat. Sci. Tech.58, 1521 (2008). doi: 10.2166/wst.2008.507
4.
NielsenH.B. and AngelidakiR.I., “Strategies for optimizing recovery of the biogas process following ammonia inhibition”, J. Bioresour. Technol.99, 7995 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.03.049
5.
AngelidakiI. and EllegaaardL., “Codigestion of manure and organic wastes in centralized biogas plants—status and future trends”, J. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.109, 95 (2003). doi: 10.1385/ABAB:109:1-3:95
6.
Mata-ÁlvarezJ.MacéS. and LlabrésP., “Anaerobic digestion of organic solid wastes. An overview of research achievements and perspectives”, J. Bioresour. Technol.74, 3 (2000). doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00023-7
7.
ChristensenJ.Hjort-GregersenK.UellendahlH.AhringB.K.BaggesenD.L.StockmarrA.MøllerH.B. and BirkmoseT., Future Biogas Plants-New Systems and Their Economic Potential, FOI report no. 188. Institute of Food and Resource Economics, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Copenhagen, Denmark (2007), (in Danish with English summary).
8.
TafdrupS., “Viable energy production and waste recycling from anaerobic digestion of manure and other biomass materials”, J. Biomass Bioenergy9, 303 (1995). doi: 10.1016/0961-9534(95)00098-4
9.
WardA.J.HobbsP.J.HollimanP.J. and JonesD.L., “Optimisation of the anaerobic digestion of agricultural resources”, J. Bioresour. Technol.99, 7928 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.02.044
10.
HafnerS.D. and BisogniJ.J., “Modeling of ammonia speciation in anaerobic digesters”, Water Res.43, 4105 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.05.044
11.
PindP.AngelidakiI.AhringB.K.StamatelatouK. and LyberatosG., “Monitoring and control of anaerobic reactors”, in Biomethanation II. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, Ed by ScheperT.Springer, Berlin, Germany, Vol. 82, pp. 135–182 (2009).
12.
WardA.J.BruniE.LykkegaardM.K.FeilbergA.AdamsenA.P.S.JensenA.P. and PoulsenA.K., “Real time monitoring of a biogas digester with gas chromatography, near-infrared spectroscopy, and membrane-inlet mass spectrometry”J. Bioresour. Technol.102, 4098 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.052
13.
Holm-NielsenJ.B. and EsbensenK.H., “Monitoring of biogas test plants: A process analytical technology approach”, J. Chemometr.25, 357 (2011). doi: 10.1002/cem.1344
14.
Holm-NielsenJ.B.AndreeH.LindorferH. and EsbensenK.H., “Transflexive embedded near infrared monitoring for key process intermediates in anaerobic digestion/biogas production”, J. Near Infrared Spectrosc.15, 123 (2007). doi: 10.1255/jnirs.719
15.
LuckS.BügeG.PlettenbergH. and HoffmannM., “Near-infrared spectroscopy for control and optimization of biogas plants”, J. Eng. Life Sci.10, 537 (2010). doi: 10.1002/elsc.201000062
16.
Holm-NielsenJ.B.DahlC.K. and EsbensenK.H., “Representative sampling for process analytical characterization of heterogeneous bioslurry systems—a reference study of sampling issues in PAT”, J. Chemolab.83, 114 (2006). doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.02.002
17.
NackeT.BrücknerK.GöllerA.KaufholdS.NakosX.NoackS.StöberH. and BeckmannD., “New type of dry substances meter using microwaves for application in biogas plants”, J. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.383, 752 (2005). doi: 10.1007/s00216-005-0105-7
18.
NackeT.BarthelA.PfliegerC.PliquettU.BeckmannD. and GöllerA., “Continous process monitoring for biogas plants using microwave sensors”, 12th Biennial Baltic Electronics Conference (BEC2010), Tallinn, Estonia, pp. 239–242 (2010).
19.
HanssonM.NordbergÅ.SundhI. and MathisenB., “Early warning of disturbances in a laboratory-scale MSW biogas process”, J. Wat. Sci. Techol.45, 255 (2002).
20.
NordbergÅ.HanssonM.SundhI.CarlssonH. and MathisenB., “Monitoring of a biogas process using electronic gas sensors and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIR)”, J. Wat. Sci. Techol.41, 1 (2000).
21.
LomborgC.J.Holm-NielsenJ.B.Oleskowicz-PopielP. and EsbensenK.H., “Near infrared and acoustic chemometrics monitoring of volatile fatty acids and dry matter during co-digestion of manure and maize silage”, J. Bioresour Technol.100, 1711 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.043
22.
IhunegboF.N.MadsenM.EsbensenK.H.Holm-NielsenJ.B. and HalstensenM., “Acoustic chemometric prediction of total solids in bioslurry: A full-scale feasibility study for on-line biogas process monitoring”, Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst.110, 135–143 (2012). doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2011.10.009
23.
JacobiH.F.MoschnerC.R. and HartungE., “Use of near infrared spectroscopy in monitoring of volatile fatty acids in anaerobic digestion”, J. Water Sci. Technol.60, 339 (2009). doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.345
24.
EN 12880, Characterization of sludges. determination of dry residue and water content. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, (2000).
25.
BrownS.D.TaulerR. and WalczakB., Comprehensive Chemometrics-Chemical and Biochemical Data Analysis.Wiley Major Reference Works, Vol. 1–4, Oxford, UK (2009).
26.
RinnanA.van den BergF. and EngelsenS.B., “Review of the most common pre-processing techniques for near-infrared spectra”, Trends Anal. Chem.28, 1201 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2009.07.007
MartensH. and NæsT., Multivariate Calibration, First edition. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK (1989).
29.
NæsT.IsakssonT.FearnT. and DaviesT., A User Friendly Guide to Multivariate Calibration and Classification.NIR Publications, Chichester, UK (2002).
30.
EsbensenK.H. and GeladiP., “Principles of proper validation: Use and abuse of re-sampling for validation”, J. Chemometr24, 168 (2010). doi: 10.1002/cem.1310
31.
DardenneP., “Some considerations about NIR spectroscopy: Closing speech at NIR-2009”, NIR news21(1), 8 (2010). doi: 10.1255/nirn.1165
