Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-8
Sequence Protein Identification by Randomized Sequence Database and Transcriptome Mass Spectrometry (SPIDER-TMS): From Manual to Automatic Application of a ‘ de Novo Sequencing’ Approach
Sequence protein identification by a randomized sequence database and transcriptome mass spectrometry software package has been developed at the University of Basilicata in Potenza (Italy) and designed to facilitate the determination of the amino acid sequence of a peptide as well as an unequivocal identification of proteins in a high-throughput manner with enormous advantages of time, economical resource and expertise. The software package is a valid tool for the automation of a de novo sequencing approach, overcoming the main limits and a versatile platform useful in the proteomic field for an unequivocal identification of proteins, starting from tandem mass spectrometry data. The strength of this software is that it is a user-friendly and non-statistical approach, so protein identification can be considered unambiguous.
NesvizhskiiA.I., “Protein identification by tandem mass spectrometry and sequence database searching”, Mass Spectrom. Data Anal. Prot.367, 87 (2007). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1385/1597452750
2.
MannM. and WilmM.S., “Error tolerant identification of peptides in sequence databases by peptide sequence tags”, Anal. Chem.66, 4390 (1994). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac00096a002
YatesJ.R.MorganS.F.GatlinC.L.GriffinP.R. and EngJ.K., “Method to compare collision-induced dissociation spectra of peptides: Potential for library searching and subtractive analysis”, Anal. Chem.70, 3557 (1998). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac980122y
5.
CraigR.CortensJ.C.FenyoD. and BeavisR.C., “Using annotated peptide mass spectrum libraries for protein identification”, J. Prot. Res.5, 1843 (2006). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr0602085
6.
FrewenB.E.MerrihewG.E.WuC.C.NobleW.S. and MacCossM.J., “Analysis of peptide MS/MS spectra from large-scale proteomics experiments using spectrum libraries”, Anal. Chem.78, 5678 (2006). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac060279n
7.
LamH.DeutschE.W.EddesJ.S.EngJ.K.KingN.SteinS.E. and AebersoldR., “Development and validation of a spectral library searching method for peptide identification from MS/MS”, Proteomics7, 655 (2007). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200600625
8.
MaB.ZhangK.HendrieC.LiangC.LiM.Doherty-KirbyA. and LajoieG., “PEAKS: Powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry”, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.17, 2337 (2003). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1196
TannerS.ShuH.FrankA.WangL.C.ZandiE.MumbyM.PevznerM.P.A. and BafnaV., “InsPecT: Identification of posttranslationally modified peptides from tandem mass spectra”, Anal. Chem.77, 4626 (2005). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac050102d
11.
EngJ.K.McCormackA.L. and YatesJ.R.I., “An approach to correlate MS/MS data to amino acid sequences in a protein database”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.5, 976 (1994). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1044-0305(94)80016-2
BellA.W.DeutschE.W.AuC.E.KearneyR.E.BeavisR.SechiS.NilssonT. and BergeronJ.J., “HUPO Test Sample Working Group: A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics”, Nat. Methods6, 423 (2009). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1333
14.
KappE.A.SchützF.ConnollyL.M.ChakelJ.A.MezaJ.E.MillerC.A.FenyoD.EngJ.K.AdkinsJ.N.OmennG.S. and SimpsonR.J., “An evaluation, comparison, and accurate benchmarking of several publicly available MS/MS search algorithms: Sensitivity and specificity analysis”, Proteomics5, 3475 (2005). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200500126
15.
SearleB.C.DasariS.TurnerM.ReddyA.P.ChoiD.WilmarthP.A.McCormackA.L.DavidL.L. and NagallaS.R., “High-throughput identification of proteins and unanticipated sequence modifications using a mass-based alignment algorithm for MS/MS de novo sequencing results”, Anal. Chem.76, 2220 (2004). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac035258x
16.
SpenglerB., “De novo sequencing, peptide composition analysis, and composition-based sequencing: A new strategy employing accurate mass determination by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.15, 703 (2004). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2004.01.007
17.
YatesJ.R.CociorvaD.LiaoL. and ZabrouskovV., “Performance of a linear ion trap-Orbitrap hybrid for peptide analysis”, Anal. Chem.78, 493 (2006). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac0514624
18.
LabellaC.KanawatiB.VogelH.Schmitt-KopplinP.LaurinoS.BiancoG. and FalabellaP., “Identification of two arginine kinase forms of endoparasitoid Leptomastix dactylopii venom by bottom up-sequence tag approach”, J. Mass Spectrom.50, 756 (2015). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jms.3585
19.
JagannathlyS. and SabareeshV., “Peptide fragment ion analyser (PFIA): A simple and versatile tool for the interpretation of tandem mass spectrometric data and de novo sequencing of peptides”, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.21: 3033 (2007). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rcm.3179
20.
FrankA.M.SavitskiM.M.NielsenM.L.ZubarevR.A. and PevznerP.A., “De novo peptide sequencing and identification with precision mass spectrometry”, J. Prot. Res.6, 114 (2007). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr060271u
21.
LabellaC., Characterization of venoms secreted from insect parasitoids by mass spectrometry. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Basilicata (2015).
