A new and simple protocol for quantitative analysis of bio-oils using gas-chromatography/mass spectrometry is suggested. Compounds were identified via their mass spectra, and then unavailable response factors were calculated with respect to diphenyl as the internal standard using a modified method previously suggested for gas chromatography with flame ionization detection. This new protocol was applied to the characterization of bio-oils obtained from the pyrolysis of woods of different sources or using different pyrolysis procedures. This protocol allowed evaluation of the yields of products from poplar pyrolysis (among 50% and 99%), while a reduced amounts of products were identified from the pyrolysis of cellulose (between 46% and 58%). The main product was always acetic acid, but it was formed in very large yields from poplar while lower yields were obtained from cellulose.
BunkerS.G., “Raw material and the global economy: Oversights and distortions in industrial ecology”, Soc. Nat. Res.9, 419 (1996). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941929609380984
3.
UtamaN.A.FathoniA.M.KristiantoM.A. and McLellanB.C., “The end of fossil fuel era: Supply-demand measures through energy efficiency”, Procedia Environ. Sci.20, 40 (2014). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.007
SimmonsB.A., in Plant Biotechnology and Agriculture, Ed by AltmanA. and HasegawaP. M.Academic Press, San Diego, p. 495 (2012).
6.
CherubiniF., “The biorefinery concept: Using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals”, Energ. Convers. Manage.51, 1412 (2010). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.01.015
7.
RafaschieriA.RapacciniM. and ManfridaG., “Life cycle assessment of electricity production from poplar energy crops compared with conventional fossil fuels”, Energ. Convers. Manage.40, 1477 (1999). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00076-X3
ZabaniotouA.A. and KarabelasA., “The Evritania (Greece) demonstration plant of biomass pyrolysis”, J. Biomass. Bioenerg.16, 431 (1999). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00004-5
10.
DupontC.ChiriacR.GauthierG. and TocheF., “Heat capacity measurements of various biomass types and pyrolysis residues”, Fuel115, 644 (2014). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fue1.2013.07.086
11.
ZhouC.-H.XiaX.LinC.-X.TongD.-S. and BeltraminiJ., “Catalytic conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to fine chemicals and fuels”, Chem. Soc. Rev.40, 5588 (2011). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C1CS15124J
BuQ.LeiH.RenS.WangaL.ZhangQ.TangJ. and RuanR., “Production of phenols and biofuels by catalytic microwave pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass”, Bioresource Technol.108, 274 (2012). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.125
14.
LuqueR.MenendezJ.A.ArenillasA. and CotJ., “Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of biomass feedstocks: The way forward?”, Energ. Environ. Sci.5, 5481 (2012). doi: http://dx.doi.org/0.1039/C1EE02450G
MohanD.PittmanC.U. and SteeleP.H., “Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: A critical review, Energ. Fuel20, 848 (2006). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef0502397
18.
SaidurR.AbdelazizE.A.DemirbasA.HossainM.S. and MekhilefS., “A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers”, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.15, 2262 (2011). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.015
19.
FanJ.KalnesT.N.AlwardM.KlingerJ.SadehvandiA. and ShonnardD.R., “Life cycle assessment of electricity generation using fast pyrolysis bio-oil”, Renew. Energ.36, 632 (2011). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.06.045
20.
UndriA.Abou-ZaidM.BriensC.BerrutiF.RosiL.BartoliM.FredianiM. and FredianiP., “Bio-oil from pyrolysis of wood pellets using a microwave multimode oven and different microwave absorbers”, Fuel153, 464 (2015). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fue1.2015.02.081
21.
BrancaC.GiudicianniP. and Di BlasiC., “GC/MS characterization of liquids generated from low-temperature pyrolysis of wood”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.42, 3190 (2003). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie030066d
22.
BrionesR.SerranoL.SequeirosA. and LabidiJ., “Influence of microwave heating on chemical properties of liquefied lignocellulosic residues”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.52, 2755 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie3026136
23.
ÖzbayN.PütünA.E. and PütünE., “Structural analysis of bio-oils from pyrolysis and steam pyrolysis of cottonseed cake”, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol.60, 89 (2001). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0165-2370(00)00161-3
24.
SalehiE.AbediJ. and HardingT., “Bio-oil from sawdust: Effect of operating parameters on the yield and quality of pyrolysis products”, Energ. Fuel.25, 4145 (2011). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef200688y
25.
SalehiE.AbediJ.HardingT.G. and Seyedeyn-AzadF., “Bio-oil from sawdust: Design, operation, and performance of a bench-scale fluidized-bed pyrolysis plant”, Energ. Fuel.27, 3332 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef400802b
26.
SalemaA.A. and AniF.N., “Pyrolysis of oil palm empty fruit bunch biomass pellets using multimode microwave irradiation”, Bioresource Technol.125102, (2012). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.002
27.
UzunB.B.Apaydin-VarolE.AtesF.ÖzbayN. and PütünA.E., “Synthetic fuel production from tea waste: Characterisation of bio-oil and bio-char”, Fuel89, 176 (2010). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fue1.2009.08.040
28.
ErtasM. and AlmaM.H., “Pyrolysis of laurel (Laurus nobilis L.) extraction residues in a fixed-bed reactor: Characterization of bio-oil and bio-char”, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol.88, 22 (2010). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2010.02.006
29.
StašM.KubičkaD.ChudobaJ. and PospíšilM., “Overview of analytical methods used for chemical characterization of pyrolysis bio-oil”, Energ. Fuel.28, 385 (2014). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ef402047y
30.
Abou-ZaidM.M.NozzolilloC.TononA.CoppensM. and LombardoD.A., “High-performance liquid chromatography characterization and identification of antioxidant polyphenols in maple syrup”, Pharm. Biol.46, 117 (2008). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13880200701735031
31.
SilvaR.V.S.CasilliA.SampaioA.L.ÁvilaB.M.F.VelosoM.C.C.AzevedoD.A. and RomeiroG.A., “The analytical characterization of castor seed cake pyrolysis bio-oils by using comprehensive GC coupled to time of flight mass spectrometry”, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol.106, 152 (2014). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.01.013
32.
SfetsasT.MichailofC.LappasA.LiQ. and KnealeB., “Qualitative and quantitative analysis of pyrolysis oil by gas chromatography with flame ionization detection and comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry”, J. Chromatogr. A1218, 3317 (2011). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2010.10.034
33.
TessaroloN.S.dos SantosL.R.M.SilvaR.S.F. and AzevedoD.A., “Chemical characterization of bio-oils using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometry”, J. Chromatogr. A, 1279, 68 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.12.052
34.
OmaisB.CrepierJ.CharonN.CourtiadeM.QuignardA. and ThiebautD., “Oxygen speciation in upgraded fast pyrolysis bio-oils by comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography”, Analyst138, 2258 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/C2AN35597C
35.
de Saint LaumerJ.-Y.CicchettiE.MerleP.EggerJ. and ChaintreauA., “Quantification in gas chromatography: Prediction of fame ionization detector response factors from combustion enthalpies and molecular structures”, Anal. Chem.82, 6457 (2010). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac1006574
36.
WangH.ProvanG.J. and HelliwellK., “HPLC determination of catechins in tea leaves and tea extracts using relative response factors”, Food Chem.81, 307 (2003). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00510-1
37.
SzulejkoJ.E.KimY.-H. and KimK.-H., “Method to predict gas chromatographic response factors for the trace-level analysis of volatile organic compounds based on the effective carbon number concept”, J. Separ. Sci.36, 3356 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.201300543
38.
González-BravoL.Marrero-DelangeD. and González-GuevaraJ.L., “Group method approach to the estimation of response factors of unavailable substances in quantitative gas chromatography”, J. Chromatogr. A888, 159 (2000). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00541-0
39.
KatritzkyA.R.IgnatchenkoE.S.BarcockR.A. and LobanovV.S., “Prediction of gas chromatographic retention times and response factors using a general quantitative structure-property relationship treatment”, Anal. Chem.66, 1799 (1994). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac00083a005
40.
TissotE.RochatS.DebonnevilleC. and ChaintreauA., “Rapid GC-FID quantification technique without authentic samples using predicted response factors”, Flavour Frag. J.27, 290 (2012). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ffj.3098
41.
UndriA.Abou-ZaidM.BriensC.BerrutiF.RosiL.BartoliM.FredianiM. and FredianiP., “A simple procedure for chromatographic analysis of bio-oils from pyrolysis”, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol.114, 208 (2015). doi: http://dx.doi.org/j.jaap.2015.05.019
42.
KimK.-H., “The properties of calibration errors in the analysis of reduced sulfur compounds by the combination of a loop injection system and gas chromatography with pulsed flame photometric detection”, Anal. Chim. Acta566, 75 (2006). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2006.02.065
43.
KimK.-H. and NguyenH.T., “Effects of injection volume change on gas chromatographic sensitivity determined with two contrasting calibration approaches for volatile organic compounds”, J. Separ. Sci.30, 367, (2007). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jssc.200600352
44.
UndriA.MeiniS.RosiL.FredianiM. and FredianiP., “Microwave pyrolysis of polymeric materials: Waste tires treatment and characterization of the value-added products”, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol.103, 149 (2013). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2012.11.011
UndriA.RosiL.FredianiM. and FredianiP., “Efficient disposal of waste polyolefins through microwave assisted pyrolysis”, Fuel116, 662 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fue1.2013.08.037
47.
MusumarraG.PisanoD.KatritzkyA.R.LapuchaA.R.LuxemF.J.MuruganR.SiskinM. and BronsG., “Prediction of gas chromatographic response factors by the PLS method”, Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol.2, 17 (1989). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0898-5529(89)90026-2
48.
JonesF.W., “Estimation of flame-ionization detector relative response factors for oligomers of alkyl and aryl ether polyethoxylates using the effective carbon number concept”, J. Chromatogr. Sci.36, 223 (1998). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chromsci/36.5.223
49.
SzulejkoJ.E. and KimK.-H., “Re-evaluation of effective carbon number (ECN) approach to predict response factors of ‘compounds lacking authentic standards or surrogates’ (CLASS) by thermal desorption analysis with GC–MS”, Anal. Chim. Acta851, 14, (2014). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2014.08.033
50.
HougenO.A.WatsonK.M. and RagatzR.A., Chemical Process Principle, Part II, Thermodynamics2nd edn.John Wiley and Sons, New York (1959).
