In the gas phase, some properties of native versus denatured protein conformations correspond to those in solution, such as affinity for protons and physical cross section. However, the capacity for hydrogen/deuterium exchange is the opposite, with ubiquitin 7+ and 13+ ions exchanging > 60 D and ~15 D atoms, respectively. A variety of experimental methods now delineate a series of conformational perturbations that can occur in the 10−12 s to 10+2 s following electrospray, including side-chain collapse, hydrophobic and electrostatic non-covalent bond unfolding and refolding into a variety of non-native structures.
FennJ.B.MannM.MengC.K.WongS.F.WhitehouseC.M., “Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules”, Science246, 64 (1989). doi: 10.1126/science.2675315
2.
GanemB.LiY.T.HenionJ.D., “Detection of noncovalent receptor–ligand complexes by mass spectrometry”, J. Am. Chem. Soc.113, 6294 (1991). doi: 10.1021/ja00016a069
3.
KattaV.ChaitB.T., “Observation of the heme–globin complex in native myoglobin by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry”, J. Am. Chem. Soc.113, 8534 (1991). doi: 10.1021/ja00071a058
4.
LiY.T.HsiehY.L.HenionJ.D.SenkoM.W.McLaffertyF.W.GanemB., “Mass spectrometric studies on noncovalent dimers of leucine zipper peptides”, J. Am. Chem. Soc.115, 8409 (1993). doi: 10.1021/ja00071a058
5.
GabelicaV.De PauwE., “Internal energy and fragmentation of ions produced in electrospray sources”, Mass Spectrom. Rev.24, 566 (2005). doi: 10.1002/mas.20027
6.
HofstadlerS.A.Sannes-LoweryK.A., “Applications of ESI-MS in drug discovery: Interrogation of noncovalent complexes”, Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery5, 585 (2006). doi: 10.1038/nrd2083
7.
HeckA.J.R.van den HeuvelR.H.H., “Investigation of intact protein complexes by mass spectrometry”, Mass Spectrom. Rev.23, 368 (2004). doi: 10.1002/mas.10081
8.
ZhouM.SandercockA.M.FraserC.S.RidlovaG.StephensE.SchenauerM.R.Yokoi-FongT.BarskyD.LearyJ.A.HersheyJ.W.DoudnaJ.A.RobinsonC.V., “Mass spectrometry reveals modularity and a complete subunit interaction map of the eukaryotic translation factor eIF3”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA105, 18139 (2008). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801313105
9.
HanX.JinM.BreukerK.McLaffertyF.W., “Extending top-down mass spectrometry to proteins with masses > 200 kDa”, Science314, 109 (2006). doi: 10.1126/science.1128868
10.
KelleherN.L.LinH.Y.ValaskovicG.A.AaserudD.J.FridrikssonE.K.McLaffertyF.W., “Top down versus bottom up protein characterization by tandem high-resolution mass spectrometry”, J. Am. Chem. Soc.121, 806 (1999). doi: 10.1021/ja973655h
11.
ChowdhuryS.K.KattaV.ChaitB.T., “Probing conformational changes in proteins by mass spectrometry”, J. Am. Chem. Soc.112, 9012 (1990). doi: 10.1021/ja00180a074
12.
KattaV.ChaitB.T., “Conformational changes in proteins probed by hydrogen-exchange electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry”, Rapid Comm. Mass Spectrom.5, 214 (1991). doi: 10.1002/rcm.1290050415
13.
SuckauD.ShiY.BeuS.C.SenkoM.W.QuinnJ.P.WamplerF.M.IIIMcLaffertyF.W., “Coexisting stable conformations of gaseous protein ions”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA90, 790 (1993). doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.3.790
14.
FreitasM.A.HendricksonC.L.EmmettM.R.MarshallA.G., “Gas-phase bovine ubiquitin cation conformations resolved by gas-phase hydrogen/deuterium exchange rate and extent”, Int. J. Mass Spectrom.185–187, 565 (1999). doi: 10.1016/S1387-3806(98)14172-6
15.
OhH.B.BreukerK.SzeS.K.GeY.CarpenterB.K.McLaffertyF.W., “Secondary and tertiary structures of gaseous protein ions characterized by electron capture dissociation mass spectrometry and photofragment spectroscopy”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA99, 15863 (2002). doi: 10.1073/pnas.212643599
16.
McLaffertyF.W.GuanZ.HauptsU.WoodT.D.KelleherN.L., “Gaseous conformational structures of cytochrome c”, J. Am. Chem. Soc.120, 4732 (1998). doi: 10.1021/ja9728076
17.
ValentineS.J.CountermanA.E.ClemmerD.E., “Conformer-dependent proton transfer reactions of ubiquitin ions”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.8, 954 (1997). doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(97)00085-8
18.
HoaglundC.S.ValentineS.J.SporlederC.R.ReillyJ.P.ClemmerD.E., “Three-dimensional ion mobility/TOFMS analysis of electrosprayed biomolecules”, Anal. Chem.70, 2236 (1998). doi: 10.1021/ac980059c
19.
BreukerK.OhH.B.HornD.M.CerdaB.A.McLaffertyF.W., “Detailed unfolding and folding of gaseous ubiquitin ions characterized by electron capture dissociation”, J. Am. Chem. Soc.124, 6407 (2002). doi: 10.1021/ja012267j
20.
LiJ.TaraszkaJ.A.CountermanA.E.ClemmerD.E., “Influence of solvent composition and capillary temperature on the conformations of electrosprayed ions: Unfolding of compact ubiquitin conformers from pseudonative and denatured solutions”, Int. J. Mass Spectrom.185–187, 37 (1999). doi: 10.1016/S1387-3806(98)14135-0
21.
BadmanE.R.MyungS.ClemmerD.E., “Evidence for unfolding and refolding of gas-phase cytochrome c ions in a Paul trap”, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.16, 1493 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.04.013
22.
BreukerK.McLaffertyF.W., “Step-wise evolution of protein native structure with electrospray into the gas phase, 10−12–102 s”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA105, 18145 (2008). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807005105
23.
SteinbergM.Z.ElberR.McLaffertyF.W.GerberR.B.BreukerK., “Early structural evolution of native Cytochrome c after solvent removal”, ChemBioChem9, 2417 (2008). doi: 10.1002/cbic.200800167
24.
ZubarevR.A.HornD.M.FridrikssonE.K.KelleherN.L.KrugerN.A.LewisM.A.CarpenterB.K.McLaffertyF.W., “Electron capture dissociation for structural characterization of multiply charged protein cations”, Anal. Chem.72, 563 (2000). doi: 10.1021/ac990811p
25.
HornD.M.BreukerK.FrankA.J.McLaffertyF.W., “Kinetic intermediates in the folding of gaseous protein ions characterized by electron capture dissociation mass spectrometry”, J. Am. Chem. Soc.123, 9792 (2001). doi: 10.1021/ja003143u
26.
BreukerK.McLaffertyF.W., “Native electron capture dissociation for the structural characterization of noncovalent interactions in native cytochrome c”, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.42, 4900 (2003). doi: 10.1002/anie.200351705
27.
BreukerK.McLaffertyF.W., “The thermal unfolding of native cytochrome c in the transition from solution to gas phase probed by native electron capture dissociation”, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.44, 4911 (2005). doi: 10.1002/anie.200500668
28.
JurchenJ.C.WilliamsE.R., “Origin of asymmetric charge partitioning in the dissociation of gas-phase protein homodimers”, J. Am. Chem. Soc.125, 2817 (2003). doi: 10.1021/ja0211508
29.
KelleherN.L.TaylorS.V.GrannisD.KinslandC.ChiuH.J.BegleyT.P.McLaffertyF.W., “Efficient sequence analysis of the six gene products (7–74 kDa) from the escherichia coli thiamin biosynthetic operon by tandem high-resolution mass spectrometry”, Protein Sci.7, 1796 (1998). doi: 10.1002/pro.5560070815
30.
KongX.CastroS.BreukerK.McLaffertyF.W., Proceedings, 57th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectrometry, Philadelphia, PA, USA, (2009).
31.
ShakhnovichE., “Protein folding roller coaster, one molecule at a time”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.106, 11823 (2009). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906228106
32.
ChungH.LewisJ.EatonW., “Experimental determination of upper bound for transition path times in protein folding from sinle-molecule photon-by-photon trajectories”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA106, 11837 (2009). doi: 10.1073/pnas.0901178106
