The application of system identification to an electrohydraulic servo system is described. Identified models are used to design pole-placement controllers for the system. A variety of parameter estimators and model structure selection techniques are compared by assessing the performance of the controllers designed from the estimated models. The least squares method processing filtered data is found to yield reliable models, and an appropriate model structure can be selected successfully by comparing prediction errors for models of different structure.
VaughanN. D.PlummerA. R.Some issues in pole-placement control of electrohydraulic servos. Proceedings of Third Bath International Fluid Power Workshop, Bath, September 1990.
2.
DaleyS.Application of a fast self-tuning control algorithm to a hydraulic test rig. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C., 1987, 201(C4), 285–295.
3.
EdgeK. A.FigueredoK. R. A.An adaptively controlled electrohydraulic servo-mechanism. Part 2: Implementation. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part B, 1987, 201(B3), 181–189.
4.
HonN.UkrainetzP. R.NikiforukP. N.BitnerD. V.Robust discrete-time adaptive control of an electrohydraulic servo actuator. Proceedings of Eighth Fluid Power Symposium, Birmingham, April 1988, pp. 495–514.
5.
VaughanN. D.PlummerA. R.Robust adaptive control for hydraulic servosystems. Proceedings of ASME Winter Annual Meeting, Dallas, November 1990.
6.
LjungL.System identification: theory for the user, 1987, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).
7.
NortonJ. P.An introduction to identification, 1986, Academic Press, London).
8.
LjungL.SöderströmT.Theory and practice of recursive identification, 1983, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts).
IsermannR.BaurU.BambergerW.KneppoP.SiebertH.Comparison of six on-line identification and parameter estimation methods. Automatica, 1974, 10, 81–103.
11.
GustavssonI.Comparison of different methods for identification of industrial processes. Automatica, 1972, 8, 127–142.
12.
SaridisG. N.Comparison of six on-line identification algorithms. Automatica, 1974, 10, 69–79.
13.
DaleyS.Self-tuning control of a hydraulic test-rig using a personal computer. GEC J. Res., 1990, 7(3), 157–166.
14.
YoungP. C.Recursive estimation and time-series analysis, 1984, Springer-Verlag, New York).
15.
SöderströmT.StoicaP.TrulssonE.Instrumental variable methods for closed loop systems. Tenth IFAC World Congress, Munich, July 1987.
16.
SöderströmT.StoicaP.Comparison of some instrumental variable methods—consistency and accuracy aspects. Automatica, 1981, 17(1), 101–115.
17.
MiddletonR. H.GoodwinG. C.HillD. J.MayneD. Q.Design issues in adaptive control. IEEE Trans. in Automatic Control, 1988, 33(1), 50–58.
18.
van den BoomA. J. W.van den EndenA. W. M.The determination of the orders of process and noise dynamics. Automatica, 1974, 10, 245–256.
19.
UnbehauenH.GöhringB.Tests for determining model order in parameter estimation. Automatica, 1974, 10, 233–244.
20.
YoungP.JakemanA.McMurtrieR.An instrumental variable method for model order identification. Automatica, 1980, 16, 281–294.
21.
YufeiX.GuoxianZ.YuanzhangL.Time series analysis of hydraulic position system (in Chinese). J. Shanghai Jiatong University, 1988, 22(2), 1–7.
22.
VaughanN. D.WhitingI. M.Microprocessor control applied to a nonlinear electrohydraulic position servo system. Proceedings of Seventh Fluid Power Symposium, Bath, September 1986, pp. 187–198.
23.
PlummerA. R.Digital control techniques for electro-hydraulic servosystems. PhD thesis, University of Bath, 1991.
24.
SagaroS.ZhaoZ.Application of digital filtering techniques. In Identification of continuous-time systems (Eds SinhaN.RaoG.), 1991 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands).
25.
YoungP.JakemanA.Refined instrumental variable methods of recursive time-series analysis. Int. J. Control, 1979, 29(1), 1–30.
26.
SöderströmT.On model structure testing in system identification. Int. J. Control, 1977, 26, 1–18.
27.
FranklinG. F.PowellJ. D.Digital control of dynamic systems, 1980, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts).
