A non-constrained, non-cemented, modular prosthesis for replacement of the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers has been developed. The prosthesis is of a surface design which is modular in construction and is implanted into the hones with a press fit. The prosthesis is designed to be implanted into patients with traumatic injuries, post-traumatic osteoarthritis and into patients with rheumatoid arthritis at an early stage in the disease where the muscles and ligaments that surround the joint are still functional and can provide joint stability.
SmithE. M.JuvinallR. C.BenderL. F.PearsonT. R.Role of the finger flexors in rheumatoid deformities of the metacarpophalangeal joints. Arthr. Rheum., 1964, 7, 467–480.
2.
HakstainR. W.TubianaR.Ulnar deviation of the fingers. The role of joint structure and function. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1967, 49A, 299–316.
3.
SmithR. J.KaplanE. B.Rheumatoid deformities at the metacarpophalangeal joints of the fingers. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1967, 49A, 31–47.
4.
BackhouseK. M.The mechanics of normal digital control in the hand and an analysis of ulnar drift of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. (England), 1968, 43, 154–173.
5.
CalnanJ. S.ReisN. D.Artifical finger joints in rheumatoid arthritis. I. Development and experimental assessment. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 1968, 27, 207–217.
6.
EllisonM. R.FlattA. E.KelleyK. J.Ulnar drift of the fingers in rheumatoid disease. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1971, 53A, 1061–1082.
7.
McMasterM.The natural history of the rheumatoid metacarpophalangeal joint. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1972, 54B, 687–697.
8.
WiseK. S.The anatomy of the metacarpophalangeal joints with observations of the aetiology of ulnar drift. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1975, 57B, 485–490.
9.
DieppeP.All you ever wanted to know about osteoarthritis. Arthritis Today, 1992, 84, 4–6.
10.
BeeversD. J.SeedhomB. B.Metacarpophalangeal joint prostheses: a review of past and current designs. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part II, 1993, 207(H4), 195–206.
11.
BeeversD. J.SeedhomB. B.Metacarpophalangeal joint prostheses: a review of the clinical results of past and current designs. J. Hand Surg., 1995, 20B(2), 125–136.
12.
WalkerP. S.ErkmanM. J.Laboratory evaluation of a metal-plastic type of metacarpophalangeal joint prosthesis. Clin. Orthop., 1975, 112, 349–356.
13.
YoumY.GillespieT. E.FlattA. E.SpragueB. L.Kinematic investigation of normal MCP joint. J. Biomechanics, 1978, 11, 109–118.
FlattA. E.FischerG. W.Biomechanical factors in the replacement of rheumatoid finger joints. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 1969, 28 (supplement), 36–41.
16.
UnsworthA.AlexanderW. J.Dimensions of the metacarpophalangeal joint with particular reference to joint prostheses. Engng in Medicine, 1979, 8, 75–80.
17.
BartelD. L.FischerG. W.FlattA. E.Investigation of human finger joint motion using the method of over determined collocation. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Engineering in medicine and biology, 1968, Vol. 10, p. 26A8.
18.
PagowskiS.PiekarskiK.Biomechanics of metacarpophalangeal joint. J. Biomechanics, 1977, 10, 205–209.
19.
TamaiK.RyuJ.AnK. N.LinscheidR. L.CooneyW. P.ChaoW. P.Three-dimensional goemetric analysis of the metacarpophalangeal joint. J. Hand Surg., 1988, 13A, 521–529.
20.
NapierJ. R.The prehensile movements of the human hand. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1956, 38B, 902–913.
21.
LandsmeerJ. M. F.Power grip and precision handling. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 1962, 21, 164–170.
22.
AndersonW. F.CowanN. R.Hand grip pressure in older people. Brit. J. Prev. Soc. Med., 1966, 20, 141–147.
PurvesW. K.BermeN.Resultant finger joint loads in selected activities. J. Biom Engng, 1980, 2, 285–289.
25.
FernandoM. U.RobertsonJ. C.Grip ‘strength’ in the healthy. Rheum. Rehabil, 1982, 21, 179–181.
26.
BlairW. F.ShurrD. G.BuckwalterJ. A.Metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty with a metallic hinged prosthesis. Clin. Orthop., 1984, 184, 156–163.
27.
BlairW. F.ShurrD. G.BuckwalterJ. A.Metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty with a silastic spacer. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1984, 66A, 365–370.
28.
MathiowetzV.KashmanN.VollandG.WeberK.DoweM.RogersS.Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Archs Phys. M Rehabil., 1985, 66, 69–74.
29.
AmisA. A.Variation of finger forces in maximal isometirc grasp tests on a range of cylinder diameters. J. Biom Engng, 1987, 9, 313–320.
30.
HelliwellP. S.The measurement of stiffness and strength in the rheumatoid hand. DM thesis, University of Oxford, 1987.
31.
AdamsB. D.BlairW. F.ShurrD. G.Schultz metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty: A long-term follow-up study. J. Hand Surg., 1990, 15A, 641–645.
32.
LeeJ. W.RimK.Measurment of finger joint angles and maximum finger forces during cylinder grip activity. J. Biom Engng, 1991, 13, 152–162.
33.
HärkönenR.PiirtomaaM.AlarantaH.Grip strength and hand position of the dynamometer in 204 Finnish adults. J. Hand Surg., 1993, 18B, 129–132.
34.
ChaoE. Y.OpgrandeJ. D.AxmearF. E.Three-dimensional force analysis of finger joints in selected isometric hand functions. J. Biomechanics, 1976, 9, 387–396.
35.
BeckenbaughR. D.New concept in arthroplasty of the hand and wrist. Archs Surg., 1977, 112, 1094–1098.
36.
BermeN.PaulJ. P.PurvesW. K.A biomechanical analysis of the metacarpophalangeal joint. J. Biomechanics, 1977, 10, 409–412.
37.
AnK. N.ChaoE. Y.LinscheidR. L.CooneyW. P.Functional forces in normal and abnormal fingers. Proceedings of the 24th Annual ORS, Dallas, 1978, p. 166.
38.
ChaoE. Y.AnK. N.Graphical interpretation of the solution to the redundant problem in biomechanics. Trans. ASME J. Biomech. Engng, 1978, 100, 159–167.
39.
WeightmanB.AmisA. A.Finger joint force predictions related to design of joint replacement. J. Biom Engng, 1982, 4, 197–205.
40.
UnsworthA.DowsonD.WrightV.Cracking joints: a bio-engineering study of cavitation in the metacarpophalangeal joint. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 1971, 30, 348–358.
41.
AleksandrowiczR.PagowskiS.SeyfriedA.Anatomic-geometric and kinematic analysis of the metacarpophalangeal articulation of the third digit of the human hand. Folia Morphologica, 1974, 33, 353–361.
42.
HertzH.Miscellaneous papers, (JonesTrans. D. E.SchottG. A.) 1896, pp. 146–183 (Macmillan, London).
43.
HamrockB. J.DowsonD.Elastohydrodynamic lubrication of elliptical contacts for materials of low elastic modulus. J. Lubric. Technol., 1978, 100, 236–245.
44.
McKellopH. A.ClarkeI. C.MarkolfK. L.AmstutzH. C.Wear characteristics of UHMW polyethylene. J. Biom Mater. Res., 1978, 12, 895–927.
45.
McKellopH. A.RöstlundT. V.The wear behavior of ion-implanted Ti-6A1-4V against UHMW polyethylene. J. Biom Mater. Res., 1990, 24, 1413–1425.
46.
DowsonD.HardingR. T.The wear characteristics of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene against a high density alumina ceramic under wet (distilled water) and dry conditions. Wear, 1982, 75, 313–331.
47.
RostokerW.GalanteJ. O.Contact pressure dependence of wear rates of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. J. Biom Mater. Res., 1979, 13, 975–964.
48.
SiblyT. F.UnsworthA.Wear of cross-linked polyethylene against itself: a material suitable for surface replacement of the finger joint. J. Biom Engng, 1991, 13, 217–220.
49.
WroblewskiB. M.Wear of high-density polyethylene on bone and cartilage. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1979, 61B, 498–500.
50.
WebbP. J.WrightK. W. J.WinterG. D.The Monk ‘soft top’ endoprosthesis. Clinical, biomechanical and histopathological observations. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1980, 62B, 174–179.
51.
MirraJ. M.MarderR. A.AmstutzH. A.The pathology of failed total joint arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop., 1982, 170, 175–183.
52.
BellR. S.SchatzkerJ.FornasierV. L.GoodmanS. B.A study of implant failure in the Wagner resurfacing arthroplasty. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1985, 67A, 1165–1175.
53.
MalinesenE. B.LindgrenJ. U.ReinholtF. P.SudmannE.Tissue reactions to wear products from polyacetal and UHMW polyethylene in total hip replacements. J. Biom Mater. Res., 1987, 21, 459–466.
54.
HowieD. W.RobertsB. V.OakeshottR.MantheyB.A rat model of bone resorption at the cement bone interface in the presence of polyethylene wear particles. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1988, 70A, 256–263.
55.
McKellopH. A.SarmientoA.SchwinnC. P.EbramzadehE.In vivo wear of titanium-alloy hip prostheses. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1990, 72A, 512–517.
56.
AmstutzH. C.CampbellP.KossovskyN.ClarkeI. C.Mechanism and clinical significance of wear debris-induced osteolysis. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., 1992, 276, 7–18.
57.
BuchertP. K.VaughnB. K.MalloryT. H.EnghC. H.BobynJ. D.Excessive metal release due to loosening and fretting of sintered particles on porous-coated hip prostheses. Report on two cases. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1986, 68A, 606–609.
58.
LennoxD. W.SchofieldB. H.McDonaldD. F.RileyL. H.A histologic comparison of aseptic loosening of cemented, press-fit and biological ingrowth prostheses. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., 1987, 225, 171–191.
59.
CaraviaL.DowsonD.FisherJ.JobbinsB.The influence of bone and bone cement debris on counterface roughness in sliding wear tests of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene on stainless steel. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part H, 1990, 204(H1), 65–70.
60.
SchultzR. J.JohnstonA. D.KrishnamurthyS.Thermal effects of polymerization of methyl-methacrylate on small tubular bones. Int. Orthop., 1987, 11, 277–282.
61.
LehnartzE.Einfuhrung in die chemische Physiologie, 1959 (Springer, Berlin).
62.
LundskogJ.Heat and tissue. An experimental investigation of the thermal properties of bone tissue and threshold levels for thermal injury. Scand. J. Plastic Reconstr. Surg., 1972, supplement 9.
63.
LabitzkeR.PaulusM.Intraoperative temperaturmessungen in der hüftchirurgie während der polymerisation des Knochenzementes palacos. Arch. Orthop. Unfallchir., 1974, 79, 341–346.
64.
FeithR.Side effects of acrylic cement, implanted into bone. Acta Orthop. Scand., 1975, 161(supplement), 10–136
65.
SwansonA. B.PoitevinL. A.DeGroot-SwansonG.KearneyJ.Bone remodeling phenomena in flexible implant arthroplasty in the metacarpophalangeal joints. Long term study. Clin. Orthop., 1986, 205, 254–267.
66.
BeckenbaughR. D.Preliminary experience with a noncemented nonconstrained total joint arthroplasty for the metacarpophalangeal joints. Orthopedics, 1983, 6, 962–965.
67.
CookS. B.BeckenbaughR. D.WeinsteinA. M.KlawitterJ. J.Pyrolite carbon implants in metacarpophalangeal joint of baboons. Orthopedics, 1983, 6, 952–961.
68.
CallaghanJ. J.Current concepts review: The clinical results and basic science of total hip arthroplasty with porous-coated prostheses. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1993, 75A, 299–310.
69.
PilliarR. M.CameronH. I J.MacnabI.Porous surface layered prosthetic device. J. Biom Engng, 1975, 10, 126–131.
70.
RhinelanderF. W.NelsonC. L.StewartR. D.StewartC. L.Experimental reaming of the proximal femur and acrylic cement implantation: vascular and histologic effects. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., 1979, 141, 74–89.
71.
KozinnS. C.JohansonN. A.BulloughP. G.The biologic interface between bone and cementless femoral endoprostheses. J. Arthroplasty, 1986, 1, 249–259.
72.
RavaglioliA.KrajewskiA.BiasiniV.MartinettiR.ManganoC.VeniniG.Interface between hydroxyapatite and mandibular human bone tissue. Biomaterials, 1992, 13, 162–167.
