Abstract
The elastohydrodynamic analysis developed in Part 1 of this work is ratified against previous Ruston and Hornsby big-end studies. Sufficiently close correlation with published in situ film-thickness measurements allows big-end bearing performance to be determined with some confidence; significant new insight was obtained.
Elasticity body forces from connecting-rod motion were found to be an integral component of the big-end representation; it is a prevalent misconception that these forces can be neglected from theoretical as well as experimental test-rig works.
Film collapse mechanisms, likened to vapour cavitation, were observed in the dynamically loaded elastic bearing; these were not detected in equivalent rigid bearing simulations.
Cyclic minimum film thickness was observed during inertial loading, irrespective of gas force loading. Two separate minimum-film conditions were identified: one in the connecting-rod's neck and a second, at higher load, in the rod's cap. The second condition is critical from a design standpoint; significantly thinner films are predicted than by rigid bearing theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.