This paper draws attention to the demise of British manufacturing and stresses the importance of design. It makes clear that unless there is a change in attitude to the role of the professional engineer Britain's manufacturing base will continue to decline with markets steadily being lost to countries with a better motivated workforce.
References
1.
WrayG. R.Technology—the resource of brainpower. Invited lecture presented at the Hilton Hotel, London, to a Senior Management Conference of the Institute of Practitioners in Work Study, Organization and Methods on Resources, technology and People, 28 November 1974; published in Work Study and ManagementServices, 1975, 19(1), 14–27.
2.
WrayG. R.How can university engineering research be directed to the needs of manufacturing industry? The Brunei Lecture at the British Association for the Advancement of Science Annual Meeting 1980; published in Engineering challenges in the 1980s, Vol. 1, 1981, Chapter 2, pp. 33–54 (Cambridge Information and Research Services Limited, Royston, Herts).
3.
The design solution: The work of the Design Council. Booklet published by the Design Council, London, 1989.
4.
FeildenG. B. R. (Chairman) Engineering design. Report of a CSIR Committee to consider the Present Standing of Mechanical Engineering Design, 1963 (HMSO, London).
5.
CoxJ.KreigbaumH.Innovation and industrial strength in the UK, West Germany, the United States and Japan, 1989 (Policy Studies Institute, London).
6.
WelbournD. F.Effective CADCAM. Professional Engng, January 1990, 3(1), 48.
7.
LawrenceP.Managers and Management in West Germany, 1980 (Croom Helm, London).
8.
FinnistonMontagueSir (Chairman) Engineering our future. Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Engineering Profession, Cmnd 7794, January 1980 (HMSO, London).
9.
Design Council warns on quality of British design.Professional Engng, February 1990, 3(2), 13.
10.
GreenhalghC.GregoryM.RayA.Employment and structural change in Britain: trends and policy options, December 1989 (Employment Institute, London).
11.
Survey in the attitudes and intentions of graduating engineers, 1989 (Imperial Ventures Limited).
12.
Recruiters' uphill struggle.Engng News, February 1990,60.
13.
HeathE.The state of Britain to come. In Conquering unemployment: the case for economic growth (Ed. ShieldsJ.), 1989, Ch. 5 (Macmillan Press in association with the Employment Institute, L.ondon).
14.
CoplinJ. F.Innovation and the role of engineering design in profitable organic business growth. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part B, 1990, 204(B3), 157–166.
15.
RichardsE. J. (Chairman) Academic-industrial collaboration in engineering research. Report of an Engineering Board Working Party, Science Research Council, September 1975.
16.
LickleyR. L. (Chairman) Report of the Engineering Design Working Party. Engineering Board of the Science and Engineering Research Council, 1983.
17.
WrayG. R.Contributions of a university mechanical engineering department to innovation in textile machinery. In Twelve notable projects—some personal accounts of engineering research in UK universities, 1983, pp. 225–258 (SERC and CEPC, London).
18.
WrayG. R.The application of mechanism theory to a textile machinery innovation. Nominated Lecture of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, 1976, 190, 45/76.
19.
Anon. New rib loading and gauge change units for fully fashioned knitwear production. Knitting Int., January 1982, 96–97.
20.
WrayG. R.BakerJ. E.VitolsR.A university approach to the recognition, identification and specification of industrial needs. Proceedings of IMechE Conference on The education and training of engineering designers, University of Bath, 1983, pp. 45–80. (Mechanical Engineering Publications, London).
21.
SatterM. A.DownsB.WrayG. R.Reduction of noise at the design stage: a case study of a lightly loaded assembly. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, 1969–70, 184 (Pt I), 593–614.
22.
SatterM. A.DownsB.WrayG. R.Reduction of impact noise at the design stage: a specific case study. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, 1972, 186, 26/72, 391–399.
23.
BurnsN. D.WrayG. R.Cam-to-needle impact forces in weft-knitting, Part I: Theory of stitch-cam impact. J. Textile Inst., 1976, 67, 189–194; Part II: A stitch-cam impact transducer, 95–198; Part III: Some measurements of stitch cam impact, 199–205; Part IV, Further measurements of stitch cam impact, 206–209; Part V: Guard-cam impact, 229–234; Part VI: A guard-cam impact transducer, 235–237; Part VII: Influences of yarn tension and machine speed on guard-cam impact, 238–243; Part VIII: The effects of some knitting parameters on guard-cam impact, 244–249; Part IX: Needle latch impact, 301–8; Part X: The characteristics of latch-needle breakages, 309–314; Part XI: The measurement of impact-induced strains in latch-needles, 315–320.
24.
PakesH. W.ParryR. M.WrayG. R.The use of optimisation techniques with precision synthesis for producing a planar linkage giving parallel motion. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 1979, 14, 171–178.
25.
WrayG. R.ParryR. M.PakesH. W.The mechanisms of a university-designed textile machine. Proceedings of Fourth World Congress on The theory of machines and mechanisms, Newcastle upon Tyne, 1975, pp. 1123–1129. (Mechanical Engineering Publications, London).
26.
VitolsR.MurphyB. J. M.WrayG. RBakerJ. E.KingT. G.Development of computer-controlled machinery for the making-up of garments. Proc. IEE, 1985, 132(PtD)(4), 178–182.
27.
WrayG. R.AcarM.Supersonic jet texturing of yarns. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part B, 1990, 204, 71–89.
28.
WrayG. R.VitolsR.GradyL.A new method for the production of yarns for specific markets. Proceedings of the World Conference of the Textile Institute, Nottingham, 1989, pp. 205–205.
29.
KingT. G.SimsR.Mechanical design in the microprocessor era—illustrations from the textile industry. Proceedings of the Engineering Design '86 Congress, paper 3A–03 (Mechanical Engineering Publications, London).
30.
WrayG. R.BakerJ. E.VitolsR.From university to industry—student participation in the innovation of commercially viable textile machinery. SEFI Conference on The education of engineers for innovative and entrepreneurial activity, Delft, Holland, 1982, pp. 386–386.
Standards in Education, 1988–89. The Annual Report of HM Senior Chief Inspector of Schools, January 1990 (HMI, Department of Education and Science, London).
33.
DaviesS.CavesR.Britain's productivity gap, 1987 (Cambridge University Press).
34.
An assessment of the costs and benefits of sandwich education.Report by a Committee on Research into Sandwich Education, June 1985 (Department of Education and Science, London).
35.
WrayG. R. (Chairman) Attaining competence in engineering design. Report of a Joint Design Council/Engineering Council Working Party, May 1991 (The Design Council and the Engineering Council, London).
36.
Standards and routes to registration (SARTOR).A Policy Statement by the Engineering Council, London, 2nd edition, January 1990.
37.
MoultonA. E. (Chairman) Engineering design education. Report of a Design Council Committee on the Education of Engineering Designers in Britain, 1976 (The Design Council, London).
38.
WrightI. C.FisherB. C.WrayG. R.A contract between university and industry to further the education of engineering undergraduates. Proceedings of the SEFI Conference, Edinburgh, September 1986, pp. 893–893.
39.
Engineering design (Feilden Report).Parliamentary Debates (Hansard), House of Commons, 10 March 1965, pp. 1729–1733.
