The transmission of heel-strike vibration using skin-mounted accelerometers was measured in normal subjects and subjects with ankylosing spondylitis. In normal subjects transmissibility was enhanced between 5 and 13 Hz and attenuated at frequencies above 15 Hz. In ankylosing spondylitis transmissibility was enhanced at 4 Hz but less so between 5 and 13 Hz and little attenuation was observed at the higher frequencies. This difference is expected in view of the pathological changes occurring in the spinal column in ankylosing spondylitis. The results support the hypothesis that the normal spinal column has to bend in order to absorb vibrations with a frequency greater than 15 Hz.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RadinE. L.PaulI. L.RoseR. M.Role of mechanical factors in the pathogenesis of primary osteoarthritis. Lancet, 1972, 1, 519–521.
2.
KelseyJ. L.HardyR. J.Driving of motor vehicles as a risk factor for acute herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. Amer. J. Epidemiol., 1975, 102, 63–73.
3.
RumyantsevG. I.ChumakK. I.Bone changes in the spine of concrete workers exposed to general high frequency vibration. Labour Hyg. Occup. Dis., 1966, 10, 5–9.
4.
ShanahanD. F.ReadingT. E.Helicopter pilot back pain—a preliminary study. Aviat. Environment. Med., 1984, 55, 117–121.
5.
FishbeinW. I.SalterL. C.The relationship between truck and tractor driving on disorders of the spine and supporting structures. Ind. Med. Surg., 1950, 19, 444–445.
6.
BurkeM. J.FearE. C.WrightV.Bone and joint changes in pneumatic drillers. Ann. Rheum. Dis., 1977, 36, 276–279.
7.
SmeathersJ. E.Some time dependent properties of the intervertebral joint when under compression. Engineering in Medicine, 1984, 13, 83–87.
8.
SmeathersJ. E.Dynamic compressive properties of human lumbar intervertebral joints: A comparison between fresh and thawed specimens. J. Biomech., 1988, 21, 425–433.
9.
PanjabiM. M.AnderssonG. B. J.JorneusL.HultE.MattssonL.In vivo measurements of spinal column vibrations. J. Bone Jt Surg., 1986, 68A, 695–702.
10.
PopeM. H.WilderD. G.FrymoyerJ. W.Mounting of the transducers in measurement of segmental motion of the spine. J. Biomech., 1986, 19, 675–677.
11.
WilderD. G.WoodworthB. B.FrymoyerJ. W.PopeM. H.Vibration and the human spine. Spine, 1982, 7, 243–254.
12.
VoloshinA.WoskJ.An in vivo study of low back pain and shock absorption in a human locomotor system. J. Biomech., 1982, 15, 21–27.
13.
WoskJ.VoloshinA.Low back pain: Conservative treatment with artificial shock absorbers. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab., 1985, 66, 145–148.
14.
HinzB.SeidalH.BrauerB.MenzelG.BluthnerR.ErdmannU.Examination of spinal column vibrations. A noninvasive approach. Euro. J. Appl. Physiol., 1988, 57, 707–713.
15.
SmeathersJ. E.Measurement of transmissibility for the human spine during walking and running. Clin. Biomech., 1989, 4, 34–40.
16.
SmeathersJ. E.Scrutiny of the classical model for intervertebral disc function. Brit. J. Rheum., 1985, 24, 219.
17.
SmeathersJ. E.HelliwellP. S.WrightV.Shock absorption by the spinal column in normals and in ankylosing spondylitis. Paper presented at the UK Informal Group on Human Response to Vibration, INRS, Nancy, France, September 1988.
