Abstract
This paper attempts to take a broad look at the practice and prospects for condition monitoring in the CEGB. The strategy of on-condition maintenance is compared with the current maintenance policy in the Board and it is concluded that, apart from auxiliary plant, there is no clear economic case for an on-condition approach. It is suggested that a rational approach to condition monitoring can only be achieved with a knowledge of plant failure statistics and the detailed characteristics of the failure modes. A detailed survey of plant failures is given with the specific examples of a tribological nature where the monitoring derived from knowledge of the failure mechanism. A brief review of the available monitoring techniques, benefits and shortcomings, and how these can be applied to the problems discussed is also given.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
