This paper examines five engine transmission systems for heavy vehicles, two with stepped and three with continuously variable transmissions. They are compared from the standpoint of torque/speed and efficiency characteristics. A strong case is made for systems with differentially driven compressors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrandsM. C.WernerJ. R.HoehneJ. L.KramerS.Vehicle testing of Cummins turbocompound diesel engine. SAE paper 810073, Detroit, Feb. 1981.
2.
DownsD. E.EdgeK. E.The optimization of performance of four diesel engine hydrostatic systems. IMechE Conference on Land transport engines—economics versus environment, Jan. 1977, Paper C21–77.
3.
DawsonJ. G.HaywardW. J.GlamannP. W.Some experiences with a differentially supercharged diesel engine. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, 1963–64, 178, part 2A, No. 6, 157.
4.
WallaceF. J.WinklerG.BownsD. E.Multi-variable control for engine transmission systems with infinitely variable ratios. SAE, Paper 770752, Milwaukee, Sept. 1977.
5.
WallaceF. J.KimberR. M.Optimization of the differential compound engine using microprocessor control. SAE paper 810256, Detroit, Feb. 1981.
6.
Robert Bosch and Co. Ltd.Automotive Handbook, p 221 (first English edition, 1980).
