Abstract
Part I of this paper reviews the changing outlook during the past forty years on methods of training the mechanical engineers of the future.
Industry and universities have reviewed and amended traditional methods and outlook in significant ways and, in particular, in ‘bridging the gap’ between those responsible for training in industry and those responsible for policy and curricula in the universities.
The effects of two world wars and the incidence of military service are indicated.
Financial considerations concerning fees and maintenance during both university training and apprenticeship are related to opportunity. The influence of the present conditions of more jobs than there are suitable applicants is considered in relation to long-term planning of the training of the mechanical engineer of the future.
The general lines of procedure usually required for those who include a full-time university course as a part of their education and training are considered, and particular attention is given to the increasingly accepted view that pre-university practical training has many advantages which are now recognized by professors and others who teach in the universities and senior technical colleges.
The need for work and play which educate and relax the young man during his post-school five-year formal engineering training period is explained and examples are given; and reference is made to the fact that those least interested in ‘outside’ activities usually benefit most if encouraged and helped to participate in such activities.
It is pointed out that the common good of the individual, the university, the firm, and the nation is most likely to be achieved if a long-term view is always given preference, and that, while time is all important and must not be wasted, time must be given to the preparation for a future career—preparation ample enough to fulfil the demands that opportunities and responsibilities in later life will make.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.