The application of position control to externally powered prosthetic arms leads to increased function and versatility when compared to a prosthetic system with open-loop control. However, various compromises are necessary owing to the limited number of available control sites. An investigation is being conducted into the possibility of combining the advantages of position control during the dynamic phase of movement with the locking facility of velocity–time control during the static phase, which leads to a larger number of available control sites and thus a greater number of degrees of freedom.
AnnettJ.‘Learning a pressure under conditions of immediate and delayed knowledge of results’, Q. Jl exp. Psychol.195911, 3.
5.
HefferlineR. F.‘Role of proprioception in the control of behaviour’, Trans. N.Y. Acad. Sci.195820, 739.
6.
LincolnR. S.‘Learning and retaining a rate of movement with the aid of kinaesthetic and verbal cues’, J. exp. Psychol.195651, 199.
7.
ChernikoffR.LemayM.‘Effect of various display-control configurations on tracking with identical and different co-ordinates’, J. exp. Psychol.196366, 95.
8.
PoultonE. C.‘Tracking behaviour’, in The acquisition of human skill (Ed. BilodeanE. A.) 1966 (Ch. 8) (Academic Press Inc., New York).
9.
BahrickH. P.BennettW. F.FittsP. M.‘Accuracy of positioning responses as a function of spring-loading in a control’, J. exp. Psychol.196549, 437.
10.
BriggsG. E.FittsP. M.BahrickH. P.‘Effects of force and amplitude cues on learning and performance in a complex tracking task’, J. exp. Psychol.195754, 262.
11.
HowlandD.NobleM. E.‘Effect of physical constants of a control on tracking performance’, J. exp. Psychol.195346, 353.
12.
WeissB.‘The role of proprioceptive feedback in positioning responses’, J. exp. Psychol.195447, 215.
