The development of artificial limbs has often been as a result of clinical experiece rather than by engineering design. This paper discusses the design problem from first principles in the light of current research. Topics presenting special difficulties are isolated—in particular, methods of control for artificial limbs, which are discussed in more detail. As a result it is possible to specify priorities for further research, urgently needed if powered artificial arms are to be worthy of modern engineering technology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MorganHuman engineering guide to equipment design1936 (McGraw-Hill).
Royal Naval Personnel Research Committee.Human factors in the design and use of naval equipment1960 (Medical Research Council).
4.
McWilliamR.‘Some characteristics of normal movement in the upper limb’1965.
5.
EngenT. J.‘Development towards a controllable orthotic system for restoring useful arm and hand actions’, Orthotic and Prosthetic Appliance Jl196317, 184.
6.
TaylorC. L.‘The biomechanics of the normal and of the amputated upper extremity’, in Human limbs and their substitutes (Eds KlopstegWilson) 1954, 169 (McGraw-Hill).
7.
DempsterW. T.‘Space requirements of the seated operator’, WADC Tech. Rept 55-159 1955.
DarcusH. D.‘The range and strength of joint movements’, in Human factors in equipment design (Ed. LewisH. K.) 1959.
10.
BahniukE.WijnschenkM. J.‘Design parameters for an orthotic arm aid’, Am. Soc. mech. Engrs1963, Paper No. 63-WA-282.
11.
EberhardtH. D.InmanV. T.BreslerB.‘The principal elements in human locomotion’, in Human limbs and their substitutes (Eds KlopstegWilson) 1954, 437 (McGraw-Hill).
12.
EngenT. J.Directors of Orthotic Dept, Texas Institute for Rehabilitation and Research, Houston, Texas. Personal communications, 1966.
13.
FurnéeE. H.‘Hybrid instrumentation for prosthetics research’, Digest 7th Int. Conf. Medical and Biological Engineering 1967, 446.
14.
PottingerJ. M. (Sept. 1967). ‘Ministry of Health Contract on the control of powered prostheses’, Quarterly Rept 1967 (September) (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London).
15.
MizenN. J.‘Design and test of a full-scale wearable, exoskeletal structure’, Cornell Aero. Lab. Rept VO-1962-V3 1964.
16.
MauchH. A. Director, Mauch Laboratories, Inc., Dayton, Ohio. Personal communication, 1966.
17.
BlackburnJ. F.ReethofG.ShearerJ. L.Fluid power control1960 (M.I.T. Press).
18.
DaviesR. M.LambertT. H.‘Dynamic characteristics of pneumatic, electric and hydraulic actuation of prothetic and orthotic devices’, Proc. Int. Symp. External Control of Human Extremities 1966, 65.
19.
SimpsonD. C. Report to Scottish Home and Health Dept, 1968 (April).
20.
LymanBiotechnology Lab. Progress Rept.1965 (University of California, Los Angeles).
21.
McKenzieD. S.‘Control sites’, Proc. Symp. Powered Prostheses, Roehampton 1965, 59.
22.
FoortJ. Director of Biomechanics Dept, Manitoba Rehabilitation Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba. Personal communication, 1966.
23.
HallM. J.‘The control of powered artificial limbs’, Ph.D. thesis, University of London, 1968.
24.
BasmajianJ. C.‘Control and training of individual motor units’, Science1963141, 440.
25.
BasmajianJ. V.‘Conscious control and training of individual spinal motor neurons in normal human subjects’, J. New Drugs19655 (2), 78.
26.
SimpsonD. C.SunderlandG. D.‘A position-servo control system for powered prosthesis’, World Medical Electronics and Instrumentation19653, 116.
27.
AllesD. S.‘Kinesthetic feedback system for amputees via the tactile sense’, Sc.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1968.
28.
PottingerJ. M.CarruthersM. T.‘Ministry of Health control on the control of powered prostheses’, Quarterly Repts1967 (April and July) (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London).
