Some of the problems involved in providing power storage and conversion units for complete arm prostheses are described. A comparison between existing pneumatic and electric systems shows that each has certain disadvantages. Three other power sources are considered as potential alternatives in the light of the limited available performance data and these show the need for more detailed data on the variation of power demand with time. Other factors influencing the design are discussed and suggestions are made regarding the need for further work in the field.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Thermoelectron Corporation.Artificial Heart Program Technology Survey and Reference Data Compilation, 1966.
2.
McWilliamR.‘The design of an experimental arm prosthesis—biological aspects’, Paper in this Symposium.
3.
McWilliamR. Personal communication.
4.
SimpsonD. C. Personal communication.
5.
Group on Power and Control Systems for Upper Limb ProsthesesProgress Rep. No. 1 (M.R.C. Powered Limbs Unit).
6.
U.S. Army Electronics Command. Proc. Power Sources Conference 1967.
7.
Energy Conversion Ltd.Data sheet.
8.
ShimotakeH.‘Bimetallic galvanic cells with fused salt electrolytes’, Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conf.1967 (Am. Soc. Mech. Engrs).
